How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Expander walk restricted operator
Statement
Let have density in a finite regular graph and let project onto functions supported in . Then For a stationary length- walk, , its confinement probability is , where the inner product is unnormalized.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: the objects and hypotheses in the statement above.
A walk that at each step chooses one of the ports uniformly has transition matrix and stationary uniform law . For any initial probability vector and integer , using the ordinary Euclidean norm, For the factor is interpreted as one. For , the adjacency-slot power has nontrivial norm . Here total variation means half the distance. (Expander walk contraction).
Proof
For supported in , let be its constant projection. Finite-sum Cauchy–Schwarz gives . Write with orthogonal parts. Since fixes the constant part and contracts the other by , the Rayleigh form is at most and at least . The supported symmetric compression has an orthonormal eigenbasis, so its absolute norm has the asserted bound; outside that space it is zero.
Expand the matrix product: each factor deletes precisely the paths with a vertex outside , and each factor supplies its step probability. Summing endpoints with the factor gives uniform initial sampling. For the expression is ; if is empty it is zero and if it is one. These statements also cover .
Depends on
Used by
- Expander walk sampled and moving sets Proposition
- Expander walk hits dense bad sets Theorem
Dependency tree · two levels
3 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.