How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The localized feature energy is semiconvex along generalized geodesics
Statement
Assume AC and the feature-measure energy hypotheses. Fix and let be concentrated on . Let define any generalized geodesic between them, and put . With , for every , The cost in this inequality is the cost of the specified plan and need not equal when . This does not assert global displacement convexity.
Statement references
Facts & Assumptions
Given: AC, , the localized feature energy, endpoint measures, and the generalized-geodesic plan .
On label functions valued in , the lifted smooth feature term has semiconvexity coefficient . The localized lifted feature energy is semiconvex
The potential is -semiconvex on every segment in . Feature-measure energy and its regularity assumptions
A generalized geodesic is the pushforward under of a triple plan with the stated optimal marginals. Generalized W2 geodesics and strong Wasserstein subgradients
The plan is a probability measure with finite second moments and almost surely. Generalized W2 geodesics and strong Wasserstein subgradients
Proof
Given: The data and hypotheses in the Statement.
Regard as random variables on the probability space and set , in . The Euclidean label dimension is and the output dimension is ; the arbitrary-label lift and Taylor statement apply independently of these dimensions. These are admissible -valued lifts by [A1], and lifts by [F3]. Therefore the feature and potential integrals defining equal the corresponding lifted integrals.
The gradient-Lipschitz estimate [F1] implies is convex on the segment: its derivative is monotone along the segment, since the gradient difference has norm at most times the segment displacement. The one-dimensional convex secant inequality gives By [F2], . Add these inequalities and use to obtain the displayed claim.
Depends on
- Feature-measure energy and its regularity assumptions
- Localized Hilbert lift of the feature energy
- The localized lifted feature energy is semiconvex
- Generalized W2 geodesics and strong Wasserstein subgradients
- The quadratic Wasserstein distance is a metric
- Optimal quadratic couplings exist and their cost is weakly lower semicontinuous
- The Axiom of Choice
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
35 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Lénaïc Chizat and Francis Bach, On the Global Convergence of Gradient Descent for Over-parameterized Models using Optimal Transport (standard reference, not scraped)
- Luigi Ambrosio, Gigli, and Giuseppe Savaré, Gradient Flows in Metric Spaces and in the Space of Probability Measures (standard reference, not scraped)