Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The localized feature energy is semiconvex along generalized geodesics

Statement

Assume AC and the feature-measure energy hypotheses. Fix r>0 and let μ0,μ1∈P2(Ω) be concentrated on Qr. Let π define any generalized W2 geodesic between them, and put μt=((1−t)x+ty)#π. With Cr=LrAr2+NrBr, for every t∈[0,1], F(μt)≤(1−t)F(μ0)+tF(μ1)−λV−Cr2t(1−t)∫∣x−y∣2dπ. The cost in this inequality is the cost of the specified plan and need not equal W22(μ0,μ1) when λV−Cr<0. This does not assert global displacement convexity.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: AC, r, the localized feature energy, endpoint measures, and the generalized-geodesic plan π.

[F1]

On label functions valued in Qr, the lifted smooth feature term has semiconvexity coefficient −Cr. The localized lifted feature energy is semiconvex

[F2]

The potential V is λV-semiconvex on every segment in Qr. Feature-measure energy and its regularity assumptions

[F3]

A generalized geodesic is the pushforward under (1−t)x+ty of a triple plan with the stated optimal marginals. Generalized W2 geodesics and strong Wasserstein subgradients

[A1]

The plan π is a probability measure with finite second moments and x,y∈Qr almost surely. Generalized W2 geodesics and strong Wasserstein subgradients

Proof

Given: The data and hypotheses in the Statement.

1.1A1F3construct

Regard (x,y) as random variables on the probability space (R3d,π) and set X(z,x,y)=x, Y(z,x,y)=y in L2(π;Rd). The Euclidean label dimension is 3d and the output dimension is d; the arbitrary-label lift and Taylor statement apply independently of these dimensions. These are admissible Qr-valued lifts by [A1], and Xt=(1−t)X+tY lifts μt by [F3]. Therefore the feature and potential integrals defining F(μt) equal the corresponding lifted integrals.

2.1F1F2step 1.1∎

The gradient-Lipschitz estimate [F1] implies X↦R(∫Φ(X)dπ)+Cr2∥X∥L2(π)2 is convex on the segment: its derivative is monotone along the segment, since the gradient difference has norm at most Cr times the segment displacement. The one-dimensional convex secant inequality gives R ⁣(∫Φ(Xt)dπ)≤(1−t)R ⁣(∫Φ(X)dπ)+tR ⁣(∫Φ(Y)dπ)+Cr2t(1−t)∥X−Y∥L2(π)2. By [F2], ∫V(Xt)dπ≤(1−t)∫V(X)dπ+t∫V(Y)dπ−λV2t(1−t)∥X−Y∥L2(π)2. Add these inequalities and use ∥X−Y∥2=∫∣x−y∣2dπ to obtain the displayed claim.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

35 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources