How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Finite iid log-likelihood averages concentrate
Statement
Let and be probability vectors on a finite nonempty alphabet with . For , write and . Let be independent with common law , define when and when , and put . Then in probability as . For every , one also has .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: with , and an independent identically distributed sample with law .
Finite probability vectors: is finite and all its coordinates have positive mass; gives whenever .
Finite Kullback–Leibler divergence: the finite mean of under is .
Order, continuity, range, and the product, quotient, and reciprocal laws for the natural logarithm: the logarithm of a finite product of positive ratios is the sum of their logarithms.
The exponential is positive and satisfies : for every real .
Expectation of a real random variable on a finite probability space: on a finite probability space, expectation is the finite probability-weighted sum.
Proof
For , every ratio is positive. By [F3], . Applying [F4] and [F5] gives and hence .
The values on the finite set form a bounded finite-valued random variable. Put ; [F2] and the finite-sum expectation formula [F6] give . Let , which is independent of since all have law . For , expanding the expectation on the product law using [F6] gives where the square is zero by [F2] and the remaining factors equal one by [F1]. Expanding therefore gives . For every , the pointwise inequality and [F6] imply , since the expectation of an indicator is the probability of its event.
Depends on
- Finite probability vectors
- Finite Kullback–Leibler divergence
- The natural logarithm as the inverse of the exponential function
- Order, continuity, range, and the product, quotient, and reciprocal laws for the natural logarithm
- The exponential is positive and satisfies $\exp(-x)=1/\exp(x)$
- Expectation of a real random variable on a finite probability space
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
16 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Yury Polyanskiy and Yihong Wu, Information Theory: From Coding to Learning, Chapter 14, §14.5, proof of Theorem 14.13 (standard reference, not scraped)