Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6-sol)audited 2026-09-30
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Geometric tail for hitting in a finite irreducible chain

Statement

Assume AC. Let E be finite, let p be an irreducible transition matrix on E, and let A⊆E be nonempty. There exist an integer m≥1 and ε∈(0,1) such that, for every x∈E and k∈N0,

Px(TA>km)≤(1−ε)k.

In particular, ExTA<∞ for every x∈E. Moreover, in any countable-state chain with transition matrix p, if C is a finite nonempty subset satisfying ∑y∈Cp(x,y)=1 for each x∈C and the restricted matrix on C is irreducible, then every state of C is recurrent for p.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: AC. The geometric-tail clause assumes a finite state space E, an irreducible transition matrix p, and a nonempty target A⊆E. The recurrence clause assumes a countable state space E, a transition matrix p, and a finite nonempty C⊆E that is closed under p and irreducible for the restricted matrix.

[F1]

Irreducibility means every pair of states communicates, with accessibility witnessed by some finite matrix power. Accessibility, communication, and irreducibility

[F2]

The transition probabilities are p(n)(x,y)=Kn(x,{y}), where K is the one-step kernel. Transition matrices and n-step probabilities

[F3]

The hitting time is TA=inf⁡{n≥0:Xn∈A} and is a stopping time; in particular {TA≤n}=⋃j=0n{Xj∈A}. Hitting, return, and visit times

[F4]

Under the deterministic initial state x, the chain law and expectation are denoted Px and Ex. Initial distribution of a Markov chain

[F5]

For bounded measurable future path functionals H, E[H(Xn,Xn+1,…)∣Fn]=h(Xn) with h(y)=EyH(X0,X1,…). Markov property for bounded future path functionals

[F6]

Finite-dimensional chain laws give Px(Xn=y)=Kn(x,{y}). Finite-dimensional laws of a Markov chain

[F7]

For a nonnegative random variable, expectation is the integral of its strict tail probabilities. Layer-cake formulas for random variables

[F8]

A state x is recurrent when Px(Tx+<∞)=1. Recurrent and transient states

[F9]

Full AC supplies a choice function for a family of nonempty sets; here it is assumed for the canonical chain-law and conditional-Markov interfaces in [F5] and [F6]. The Axiom of Choice

Proof

technique · direct
1.1F1F2F4F6given

Fix one a∈A. For x∉A, irreducibility gives a nonempty set {n≥1:p(n)(x,a)>0}; let nx be its least element. Set nx=0 for x∈A. By [F2] and [F6], Px(TA≤nx)>0 for every x: it is 1 on A, and off A the event {Xnx=a} has positive probability. Since E is finite, m:=max⁡(1,max⁡x∈Enx) is finite and qx:=Px(TA≤m)>0 for every x. Thus ε:=min⁡(1/2,min⁡x∈Eqx) lies in (0,1) and qx≥ε uniformly. The witness lengths are least natural numbers, so this finite construction makes no choice-function assumption.

2.1F3F4F5step 1.1given

Define the bounded path functional Hm(ω)=1{ωj∉A for 0≤j≤m} and rm(x):=ExHm(X0,X1,…)=Px(TA>m). Step 1.1 gives rm(x)=1−qx≤1−ε for every x. For k≥0 let Bk={TA>km}∈Fkm by [F3]. The event Bk+1 is Bk intersected with avoidance of A during the next m steps. Applying [F5] at time km and integrating over Bk yields Px(Bk+1)=Ex[1Bkrm(Xkm)]≤(1−ε)Px(Bk). This unconditional recursion also holds when a survival event has probability zero.

3.1F4F7step 2.1algebra

Since Px(B0)≤1, induction in step 2.1 gives Px(TA>km)≤(1−ε)k for every k≥0. Since TA is integer-valued (with +∞ allowed), its strict tail is constant on each interval [j,j+1); integrating that tail in [F7] gives ExTA=∑j≥0Px(TA>j). Writing j=km+s with 0≤s<m and using monotonicity of the tail, ExTA≤m∑k≥0(1−ε)k=mε<∞. This bound is uniform in x.

4.1F2F4F5F6F7F8step 1.1step 2.1step 3.1given

The same estimate gives the scaffold's finite-class return consequence. For this clause, let E be countable and let C⊆E be finite and nonempty, satisfy ∑z∈Cp(y,z)=1 for each y∈C, and have an irreducible restricted matrix. For each y∈C, closure and the finite-dimensional iterated law [F6] imply Py(X0,…,Xn∈C)=1 for every n and identify the joint law of (X0,…,Xn) with that of the restricted matrix on C. In particular, each event {T{a}>n} has the same probability under the ambient and restricted chains; summing these integer tails by [F7] shows their hitting-time expectations agree. Fix a∈C and put M=max⁡y∈CEyT{a}<∞ by applying the argument of steps 1.1–3.1 to this finite restricted chain. For every n≥0, the bounded future-path Markov identity at time 1, applied to avoidance of a in the next n+1 coordinates, gives Pa(Ta+>n+1)=∑y∈Cp(a,y)Py(T{a}>n). Summing this identity over n≥0 and using the same integer-valued tail identity from [F7] as in step 3.1 gives EaTa+=1+∑y∈Cp(a,y)EyT{a}≤1+M<∞. Hence Pa(Ta+<∞)=1, so [F8] makes a recurrent. Since a was arbitrary, every state of C is recurrent.

5.1F3F5F6step 1.1step 2.1step 3.1step 4.1F9given∎

The nonempty-target hypothesis is necessary: for A=∅, TA=∞ and the finite-mean conclusion fails. If A=E or the starting state lies in A, then TA=0 and the tail bound holds immediately; for a one-state chain these are the only target cases. Deterministic and other degenerate rows are covered by the same positive accessibility witnesses and the uniform block estimate. At k=0 the asserted bound is just Px(TA>0)≤1. AC is used only through [F5] and [F6]; all path-length witnesses above are least natural numbers. The theorem is not an iff statement.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

29 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources