How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Geometric tail for hitting in a finite irreducible chain
Statement
Assume AC. Let be finite, let be an irreducible transition matrix on , and let be nonempty. There exist an integer and such that, for every and ,
In particular, for every . Moreover, in any countable-state chain with transition matrix , if is a finite nonempty subset satisfying for each and the restricted matrix on is irreducible, then every state of is recurrent for .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: AC. The geometric-tail clause assumes a finite state space , an irreducible transition matrix , and a nonempty target . The recurrence clause assumes a countable state space , a transition matrix , and a finite nonempty that is closed under and irreducible for the restricted matrix.
Irreducibility means every pair of states communicates, with accessibility witnessed by some finite matrix power. Accessibility, communication, and irreducibility
The transition probabilities are , where is the one-step kernel. Transition matrices and n-step probabilities
The hitting time is and is a stopping time; in particular . Hitting, return, and visit times
Under the deterministic initial state , the chain law and expectation are denoted and . Initial distribution of a Markov chain
For bounded measurable future path functionals , with . Markov property for bounded future path functionals
Finite-dimensional chain laws give . Finite-dimensional laws of a Markov chain
For a nonnegative random variable, expectation is the integral of its strict tail probabilities. Layer-cake formulas for random variables
A state is recurrent when . Recurrent and transient states
Full AC supplies a choice function for a family of nonempty sets; here it is assumed for the canonical chain-law and conditional-Markov interfaces in [F5] and [F6]. The Axiom of Choice
Proof
Fix one . For , irreducibility gives a nonempty set ; let be its least element. Set for . By [F2] and [F6], for every : it is on , and off the event has positive probability. Since is finite, is finite and for every . Thus lies in and uniformly. The witness lengths are least natural numbers, so this finite construction makes no choice-function assumption.
Define the bounded path functional and . Step 1.1 gives for every . For let by [F3]. The event is intersected with avoidance of during the next steps. Applying [F5] at time and integrating over yields . This unconditional recursion also holds when a survival event has probability zero.
Since , induction in step 2.1 gives for every . Since is integer-valued (with allowed), its strict tail is constant on each interval ; integrating that tail in [F7] gives . Writing with and using monotonicity of the tail, This bound is uniform in .
The same estimate gives the scaffold's finite-class return consequence. For this clause, let be countable and let be finite and nonempty, satisfy for each , and have an irreducible restricted matrix. For each , closure and the finite-dimensional iterated law [F6] imply for every and identify the joint law of with that of the restricted matrix on . In particular, each event has the same probability under the ambient and restricted chains; summing these integer tails by [F7] shows their hitting-time expectations agree. Fix and put by applying the argument of steps 1.1–3.1 to this finite restricted chain. For every , the bounded future-path Markov identity at time , applied to avoidance of in the next coordinates, gives Summing this identity over and using the same integer-valued tail identity from [F7] as in step 3.1 gives . Hence , so [F8] makes recurrent. Since was arbitrary, every state of is recurrent.
The nonempty-target hypothesis is necessary: for , and the finite-mean conclusion fails. If or the starting state lies in , then and the tail bound holds immediately; for a one-state chain these are the only target cases. Deterministic and other degenerate rows are covered by the same positive accessibility witnesses and the uniform block estimate. At the asserted bound is just . AC is used only through [F5] and [F6]; all path-length witnesses above are least natural numbers. The theorem is not an iff statement.
Depends on
- The Axiom of Choice
- Accessibility, communication, and irreducibility
- Hitting, return, and visit times
- Transition matrices and n-step probabilities
- Markov property for bounded future path functionals
- Layer-cake formulas for random variables
- Initial distribution of a Markov chain
- Finite-dimensional laws of a Markov chain
- Recurrent and transient states
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
29 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Levin, Peres and Wilmer, Markov Chains and Mixing Times, second edition (standard reference, not scraped)
- Roch, Lecture Notes on Measure-Theoretic Probability Theory, Note 24 (standard reference, not scraped)