How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Tied upper ranks on a finite multiset
Statement
Let with . Let be uniform on and let be independent of and uniform on . Set Then is uniform on , while is superuniform: for every .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A nonempty finite list of real numbers, a uniform random index , and an independent uniform variable .
A uniform law on a nonempty finite set assigns equal weight to each point. The uniform probability space on a nonempty finite set
Every nonempty finite list of real values has a maximum; repeatedly removing all indices at that maximum sorts the distinct values. Every nonempty finite set of reals has a maximum and a minimum
The tie breaker is independent of the selected index. Independent random elements
has the uniform Borel law on , so its probability on an interval is that interval's length.
Proof
Starting from the given list, repeatedly take the maximum of the remaining entries and remove every index carrying that value. By [F2] each nonempty remaining list has a maximum, and each iteration removes at least one of the original indices, so the process ends after at most iterations. It produces distinct values with block sizes . Put , so . By [F1], the event that has probability . On that event, and, by [A1] and [F3], , uniform on the interval of length .
By step 1.1, the intervals are consecutive, begin at , and end at . Conditional on , , so for its conditional CDF is below the left endpoint, between the endpoints, and above the right endpoint, by [A1]. Multiplying each conditional CDF contribution by gives the length of . These lengths sum to because the intervals partition up to shared endpoints. Hence for every , so is uniform.
For , is the sum of over those blocks whose right endpoint is at most . These blocks form an initial segment; if the last is , the sum telescopes to , and if there is no such block the sum is zero. Hence .
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
17 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Jesse Hemerik and Jelle Goeman, Exact testing with random permutations, randomized p-value result (standard reference, not scraped)