How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Finite-node Nyström equations are equivalent to their reconstructed equations
Statement
Let (The space of continuous real-valued functions on a nonempty compact metric space), let , let , and let . Define the finite-rank linear map and, for , define the square matrix and vector Then the solutions of are in bijection with the solutions of , via The nullspaces of and are linearly isomorphic by . In particular, is bijective if and only if is nonsingular.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The space , nodes , continuous coefficient functions , and as in the Statement.
The space of continuous real-valued functions on a nonempty compact metric space: members of are continuous real-valued functions on , so finite linear combinations of the and lie in .
Rank-nullity: : a linear map on the finite-dimensional space is injective if and only if it is surjective, hence a square matrix is nonsingular exactly when its kernel is zero.
Proof
Given: The data in the Statement, the operator , the matrix , and the vector .
If solves , put . Evaluating at gives for every , which is exactly .
Conversely, if , define . By [F1] this lies in . The matrix equation gives for each , so and it solves . These constructions are inverse because each reconstructed function has the prescribed grid values.
If and , set . The homogeneous matrix equations imply ; hence and . Thus a nonzero matrix kernel gives a nonzero kernel of . Conversely, if and , then satisfies ; if , the formula would give , a contradiction. Therefore the two kernels are simultaneously trivial. By [F2] this is equivalent to being nonsingular; [step 2.1] then gives bijective solvability of the reconstructed equation exactly when the matrix is nonsingular.
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
14 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Andreas Neubauer and Ronny Ramlau, Lecture Notes: Integral Equations and Boundary Value Problems, §3.3 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Habib Ammari, Brian Fitzpatrick, and Sanghyeon Yu, Mathematical and Computational Methods in Photonics: Tutorial Notes, §1.4.1 (standard reference, not scraped)