Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedaudited 2026-09-07
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Finite roof squares and composable pairs can be cleared

Statement

Let f:XY and f:XY be ordinary arrows, and let α:QXQX, β:QYQY satisfy βQf=Qfα. There exist f:XY, k:XX, l:YY, and denominators s:XX, t:YY, such that fk=lf, fs=tf, α=Q(s)1Q(k), β=Q(t)1Q(l). Moreover two composable localized arrows and their composite can simultaneously be represented by ordinary arrows after denominator isomorphisms of the three objects.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Let f:XY and f:XY be ordinary arrows, and let α:QXQX, β:QYQY satisfy βQf=Qfα. There exist f:XY, k:XX, l:YY, and denominators s:XX, t:YY, such that fk=lf, fs=tf, α=Q(s)1Q(k), β=Q(t)1Q(l). Moreover two composable localized arrows and their composite can simultaneously be represented by ordinary arrows after denominator isomorphisms of the three objects.

[F1]

Every localized arrow has either roof orientation, and equality of ordinary arrows is detected by a denominator (The calculus of fractions constructs the localization).

[F2]

Composition of roof classes is independent of representatives and is associative (Composition of roofs is well defined).

Proof

1.1

Write α=Q(s)1Q(k). The outgoing Ore square for s,f gives t:YY in S and f:XY with fs=tf. Write β=Q(q)1Q(i), and apply Ore to t,q to find r:YY(3) in S and j with rt=jq. Replace f,t by rf,rt and put l=ji. Then β=Q(t)1Q(l) and the right square commutes.

F1F2
2.1

The localized commuting square now gives Q(lf)=Q(fk). Dual equality detection supplies d in S with dlf=dfk. Replace l,f,t by dl,df,dt; both ordinary squares now commute and dtS. This proves the square assertion, including identity or coincident arrows.

F1step 1.1algebra
3.1

For a composable pair α:QXQY, β:QYQZ, write α=Q(s)1Q(f) with s:YY in S. Write βQ(s)1=Q(t)1Q(g) with t:ZZ in S and g:YZ. Thus after the object comparisons 1X,Q(s),Q(t) the pair is Q(f),Q(g) and its composite is Q(gf). The equalities follow from the proved composition law, not from an assumption about arbitrary diagrams.

F1F2algebra

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

5 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources