How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Every open cover of a compact Hausdorff space has a finite open star-refinement
Statement
Every open cover of a compact Hausdorff space has a finite open star-refinement.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A compact Hausdorff space and an open cover .
A compact Hausdorff space is regular and normal (A compact Hausdorff space is regular and normal, hence and ).
Compactness supplies finite subcovers (Open cover, subcover, and compact topological space; a compact subset is a subspace that is compact in its own right).
A finite family is indexed by a natural number (The cardinality of a finite set).
A finite family of nonempty sets admits simultaneous choices (Every natural-number-indexed list of nonempty sets has a choice function on its family of values), and closure is the least closed superset (Interior, closure, boundary, exterior, derived set and isolated point in a topological space).
Proof
Let be the family of all open sets such that for some . This family covers . Indeed, for , normality separates the closed sets and by disjoint open sets; the open set containing has closure contained in . This definition uses no choices indexed by .
We record a finite shrinking construction. Given a finite open cover , recursively put The earlier covering clauses imply . Normality separates from , giving an open with . At the last stage the cover . Thus every finite open cover has an open shrinking whose closures remain in the original members.
Compactness gives a finite subcover of . Finite choice supplies with for each .
From a finite cover and an open shrinking as in step 1.2, form, for each nonempty , discarding empty members. These finitely many sets are open and cover : at , take . Moreover, choose with . Every containing has , so . Hence the point-star lies in . Call this a barycentric refinement of .
Apply step 2.2 to the finite cover and its shrinking from step 2.1, obtaining a finite open barycentric refinement of . Apply steps 1.2 and 2.2 again to , obtaining a finite open barycentric refinement of .
The cover star-refines . Fix and . Barycentricity of gives with . If meets at , barycentricity of gives containing . Both and lie in , and , so . Thus .
The finite open cover is therefore a star-refinement of the original cover.
Depends on
- A compact Hausdorff space is regular and normal, hence $T_3$ and $T_4$
- Open cover, subcover, and compact topological space; a compact subset is a subspace that is compact in its own right
- Hausdorff space: distinct points have disjoint open neighbourhoods; every metrizable space is Hausdorff and the indiscrete topology on two points is not
- The cardinality $\lvert A\rvert$ of a finite set
- Every natural-number-indexed list of nonempty sets has a choice function on its family of values
- Interior, closure, boundary, exterior, derived set and isolated point in a topological space
Used by
Dependency tree · next 3 levels
Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 84 results over 23 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- J. Wodzicki, Uniform Structure (standard reference, not scraped)
- M. Kunzinger, General Topology (standard reference, not scraped)