Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

A finite-temperature minimizer has strictly interior occupations

Statement

Assume E in the model of Fixed-particle finite-temperature density-matrix free energy is C1 on an open neighborhood of Dr, with 0<r<n and β>0. Every global minimizer D of Fβ satisfies 0≺D≺I; equivalently, each eigenvalue of D lies strictly between 0 and 1.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A global minimizer D∈Dr, a C1 energy on a neighborhood of the compact density domain, 0<r<n, and β>0.

[F1]

The density domain fixes tr⁡D=r and the entropy is tr⁡ϕ(D) (Fixed-particle finite-temperature density-matrix free energy).

[F3]

For 0<x<1, ϕ′(x)=log⁡x−log⁡(1−x) and the endpoint behavior follows from xlog⁡x→0 (The natural logarithm has derivative 1/x and equals the integral from 1 to x of 1/t, The finite-temperature trace entropy is continuous at occupation endpoints).

[F4]

Proof

1.1F1F2F3F4givenalgebra

Diagonalize D by [F2], with eigenvalues dj∈[0,1] and ∑jdj=r. If di=0, then r>0 gives an index j with dj>0. For small t>0, Dt=D+t(eiei∗−ejej∗) remains in Dr. If dj∈(0,1), ϕ′ is bounded near dj, so [F4] gives ϕ(dj−t)−ϕ(dj)=O(t). Also (1−t)log⁡(1−t)=O(t) because this scalar function is differentiable at 0. Thus the entropy change is ϕ(t)+ϕ(dj−t)−ϕ(0)−ϕ(dj)=tlog⁡t+O(t) by [F3]. If dj=1, it is ϕ(t)+ϕ(1−t)=2tlog⁡t+O(t) by ϕ(1−t)=ϕ(t). The energy change is O(t) by Fréchet differentiability of E at D along the fixed direction eiei∗−ejej∗. Dividing the total free-energy change by t gives β−1log⁡t+O(1) (or 2β−1log⁡t+O(1)), which is negative for sufficiently small t. This contradicts minimality.

2.1F1F2F3F4givenstep 1.1algebra∎

If di=1, then r<n gives j with dj<1. Transfer t from the ith eigendirection to the jth: Dt=D+t(ejej∗−eiei∗). If dj∈(0,1), the term that leaves the endpoint 1 is ϕ(1−t)=ϕ(t)=tlog⁡t+O(t) and the interior term changes by O(t) by [F4]. If dj=0, the two endpoint terms change by 2ϕ(t)=2tlog⁡t+O(t). The energy change is O(t) by differentiability as in step 1.1. Dividing by t again gives a negative free-energy change for small t, contradicting minimality. No eigenvalue can equal 0 or 1, proving the claim.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

33 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources