Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-14
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The finitely additive integral is well-defined and isometric

Statement

For every νba(P(N)), the finite-range formula Iν0 is representation-independent and has a unique bounded linear extension Iν(). Moreover

Iν=ν(N).

Consequently νIν is a linear isometry into ().

Facts & Assumptions

[L1]

Finite-range sequences are uniformly dense in , and the finite-range integral is the partition formula (The finitely additive integral on ell-infinity).

Proof

technique · direct

Given: The objects and hypotheses in the Statement.

1.1

Two partition representations of s have the common refinement [given, L1] (AjBk)j,k. Finite additivity replaces each original summand by its sum over the refinement; because both coefficients equal sn on a nonempty cell, the two refined sums agree. Thus Iν0 is well-defined and linear.

L1finite additivity
2.1

For a partition representation,

givenL1step 1.1

Iν0(s)jcjν(Aj)sν(N).

Hence Iν0 is bounded with norm at most ν(N). [L1, definition of variation]

3.1

Use the fixed dyadic grid to define a finite-range quantization qk(x) [given, L2, step 2.1] with qk(x)x2k (coordinatewise in a square over C). Step 2.1 makes (Iν0(qk(x)))k Cauchy; [L2] supplies its limit. The same estimate shows independence of any approximating finite-range sequence, linearity, uniqueness, and the bound Iνν(N).

L2step 2.1fixed quantizer
4.1

Given ε>0, choose a finite partition (Aj) with [given, step 3.1] jν(Aj)>ν(N)ε. Put cj=1 when ν(Aj)=0 and otherwise cj=ν(Aj)/ν(Aj) (the same sign formula over R). Then jcj1Aj=1 and its integral is jν(Aj). Thus Iνν(N)ε; letting ε0 proves equality. Linearity in ν is immediate from the formula.

steps 1.13.1variation supremum

Depends on

Used by

Cited to discharge well-definedness by The finitely additive integral on ell-infinity.

Dependency tree · two levels

20 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources