How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Finite torsion-free abelian freeness by explicit rational coordinates without choice
Statement
Every finitely generated torsion-free abelian group is isomorphic to for some finite integer . Here torsion-free means with implies . More precisely, a fixed finite generating list yields an embedding of into a finite-rank integer lattice, and every subgroup of has a basis of at most elements. These conclusions require no form of the Axiom of Choice and no general PID factorization or structure theorem.
Statement references
Facts & Assumptions
Given: An abelian group generated by a finite list , with no nonzero integer torsion.
The rationals with their fraction operations form a field (The rationals form a field); the vector-space axioms are those of Vector space over a field.
Every subgroup of the additive integers is for a unique , with the least positive element when the subgroup is nonzero (Every subgroup of is for exactly one natural number ). Its proof uses the integer division algorithm and the well-ordering of the natural numbers, without a choice hypothesis.
Proof
Given: The data in the Statement and the fixed generating list.
On pairs with and positive integer , put when . This is an equivalence relation. Reflexivity and symmetry are immediate. If and , then , so torsion-freeness gives , proving transitivity. Denote the class of by and its quotient set by . Define , , , and for integer and positive integer . These are independent of representatives: if and , multiplying the first relation by and the second by gives the cross-multiplied equality for the two proposed sums. If also , then and , which gives the scalar equality. Negation and zero respect the relation as well.
For completeness, every subgroup is free on at most elements, by induction on the finite integer . The case has the empty basis. For , project to the first coordinate. Its image is by [F2]. The kernel is identified by the remaining coordinates with a subgroup of , so the induction hypothesis gives it a basis of at most elements. If , this kernel is all of . If , take one element with first coordinate . Every has first coordinate for a unique integer , and is in the kernel. Hence the kernel basis together with generates . It is independent, because the first coordinate of a relation first forces the coefficient of to be zero, and then independence of the kernel basis forces all remaining coefficients to be zero. This proves the induction step for every subgroup, without assuming it is finitely generated in advance.
The operations make a rational vector space. Addition is commutative because , and both associations of a three-term sum have representative for inputs . Zero is an identity and the negative sums to . The identities and follow by cross multiplication, reducing respectively to and . Scalar associativity follows from for , and scalar acts as the identity. These are all axioms in [F1]. The map , , is additive and injective, since forces . Every equals , so is spanned over by the fixed finite list .
Process that finite spanning list in its given order, retaining a vector exactly when it does not belong to the span of those previously retained. The resulting list spans , because each discarded vector was already in the span of an earlier retained sublist. It is independent: in a nonzero finite relation, the last vector with nonzero coefficient would belong to the span of the earlier ones, contrary to its retention rule. Thus it is a basis, constructed by a finite recursion rather than by an arbitrary basis-selection theorem. Each has unique rational coordinates in this basis. Take to be the product of the positive denominators of the finitely many coordinates, using for the empty product. For , define as times the coordinate vector of . Every is an integer linear combination of the , so . The map is additive and injective, since , coordinates are unique and is injective.
Apply step 1.2 to . Its finite basis and the injective map in step 3.1 identify with for some , giving the asserted finite freeness (rename to in the first assertion). The only selections were a single finite generating list, finitely many unique coordinate tuples, and at most one lift at each of finitely many integer-coordinate induction stages. Existence of such finitely many witnesses does not require any choice axiom. The explicit rationalization and integer-subgroup proof used no general PID structure or factorization theorem.
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
31 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- C. Löh, Geometric Group Theory: An Introduction, finitely generated abelian groups (standard reference, not scraped)
- Keith Conrad, Modules over a PID (standard reference, not scraped)