How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The first potentially nonzero homotopy group of a wedge of higher spheres has its cell basis
Statement
Let , let be any set, and let have its CW wedge topology and common basepoint . Write for the inclusions and for collapse of the other summands. Then for , and is an isomorphism. Its inverse sends a based sphere representative to the finitely supported vector . The empty wedge is a point. All statements are choice-free.
Facts & Assumptions
Cellular attachments with finite boundary support form a CW complex constructs the CW wedge from a point and supplied disks with constant boundaries. The explicit quotient homeomorphism in Cubical and spherical models of higher homotopy agree identifies a boundary-collapsed -cube with the oriented based sphere and identifies its based classes and operations.
Only the choice-free coordinate-continuity clause of A map into a product is continuous iff each of its components is; the projections are continuous and open; and each projection is surjective when every factor is nonempty, which for an infinite index set uses the Axiom of Choice is used; no arbitrary-product nonemptiness claim is used.
Heine-Borel in : with the Euclidean metric a subset of is compact if and only if it is closed and bounded, and the proof by bisection uses no choice principle; the same holds on the real line and For a metric space with its metric topology, compactness in the topological sense is compactness in the metric sense, and the two notions of compact subset coincide make finite cubes compact. The image of a compact metric space under a continuous map is compact, and so is the image of any compact subset and In a Hausdorff space a point and a disjoint compact set, and two disjoint compact sets, have disjoint open neighbourhoods; hence every compact subset is closed, and in a compact Hausdorff space the compact subsets are exactly the closed ones give the compact-to-Hausdorff closed-map argument.
High relative cells do not change lower homotopy gives homotopy isomorphisms below the first relative cell dimension minus one, and lower connectivity.
Based sphere maps are classified by degree gives the choice-free degree isomorphism on each sphere, sending the identity to one. Higher homotopy classes form groups and are abelian above degree one makes abelian for .
Compact CW images have finite cell support without choice gives finite cell support for every individual compact-domain representative or homotopy. Free abelian group on a set specifies the universal mapping property of a free abelian group; its finite-support model is verified below.
Proof
Given: and the standard based copies of the oriented sphere in the statement. Use the fixed based cubical quotient homeomorphism of [F1] on each copy.
Attach one -cell for each to a single vertex , by its constant boundary map. The boundary support is the singleton vertex, so [F1] proves this is a CW complex. On each closed cell it is the quotient sphere described by [F1]; its map-out test agrees with the ordinary wedge identification of these spheres when is nonempty. When is empty retain the initial point. Each is continuous: on its own characteristic cube it is the sphere quotient, and on every other characteristic cube it is constant, so the map-out test applies. The same test makes the inclusions continuous. Since every relative cell over has dimension , [F4] proves vanishing of for and path-connectedness.
Define concretely as the set of functions for which is finite. Pointwise addition and negation stay in this set, since a sum's support lies in the union of the two finite supports; they satisfy the abelian group laws coordinatewise. Let be one at and zero elsewhere. Every is the finite sum . For any abelian group and function , the formula is well defined: finite sums may be reordered and zeros inserted by the abelian laws. Using the union of two supports proves additivity. It sends to , and every homomorphism with these values must have this formula by the finite decomposition of . Thus this model satisfies exactly the universal property in [F6], including empty . No choice of an ordering for every finite subset is made; independence shows the value is uniquely specified.
First suppose is finite. Give its ordinary product topology. It is Hausdorff: two distinct tuples differ in some coordinate, and disjoint sphere neighborhoods in that coordinate have disjoint inverse images. For each subset , the points with precisely the coordinates of outside their basepoints form a cell of dimension . Its characteristic map is the product of the fixed sphere quotient maps on the cube , with the other coordinates at their basepoints; it is continuous by [F2] and a homeomorphism on the cube interior onto that cell. Its boundary lies in the cells indexed by proper subsets of , since at least one block is on its cube boundary. A cube is radially homeomorphic to a disk, preserving its boundary, so these are valid characteristic disks. There are finitely many cells.
These cells have the CW weak topology of the actual ordinary product. Each characteristic image is compact by [F3], hence closed in . Its map from its compact disk is a closed surjection onto its image: a closed disk subset is compact, and its image is closed in the Hausdorff target. Thus it is quotient. If a subset of has closed inverse image in every characteristic disk, its intersection with each characteristic image is closed there and hence closed in . The finite union of these intersections is the whole subset, so it is closed in . This proves the weak topology; closure finiteness is automatic for the finite cell family, and the boundary and interior conditions were proved in step 2.1. The union of the cells for is the axes subcomplex, identified with by its identical sphere characteristic maps and weak topology. Every other cell has dimension at least . By [F4], the inclusion therefore induces an isomorphism on , since exactly when . This proves the product-CW assertion needed here directly, without using any published example as a prerequisite.
The coordinate map is an isomorphism. To see this, a based cube in has continuous based coordinate cubes by [F2], and a homotopy projects to coordinate homotopies. Conversely, pair any finite list of coordinate representatives to get a continuous based product cube, and pair the finite coordinate homotopies to prove independence. The two constructions undo each other pointwise. They preserve the half-cube concatenation formulas in each coordinate, so the bijection is a homomorphism. Only finitely many representatives or homotopies have been selected. By [F5], degree identifies this finite product with . Under the inclusion from step 3.1, has identity in coordinate and constants in the others, hence the th integer unit vector. A finite product of copies of is its finite direct sum, proving both formulas in the statement for finite .
For arbitrary , the displayed map is well defined: every input has finite support, and the finite sum is independent of its order because is abelian by [F5]. Every based sphere representative can be pulled back to a based cube by [F1]. Its image is contained in a finite subcomplex by [F3, F6], necessarily a finite subwedge of this particular CW structure (enlarge by if necessary). The finite result in step 4.1 expresses its class as a finite sum of the corresponding inclusions. Therefore is surjective. If a finite sum of these inclusions is null in , represent that sum by finite concatenation of their cubes and take a based nullhomotopy. Its compact cube image lies in another finite subwedge by [F3, F6]. Enlarge its finite index set to include the support of the original sum. The sum is then null in that finite subwedge, where step 4.1 says all its coefficients are zero. Thus is injective.
For a representative with image in as in step 5.1, every with is constant and has degree zero by [F5]. For , its degree is exactly the corresponding coefficient in the finite computation of step 4.1. Hence the vector of degrees is finitely supported and is the inverse to . Degree is invariant under based homotopy by [F5], so this formula is independent of . The empty index set gives the trivial group of a point and the zero direct sum. A one-element index set recovers the sphere degree theorem. The restriction is essential in step 3.1's strict inequality and in the abelian sum; no analogous free-abelian assertion is made for wedges of circles. Zero coefficients, constant maps and degree zero are retained in steps 4.1–5.1. All infinite-index arguments use one compact image and its finite support, not a choice over all indices. This proves the claims without AC.
Depends on
- Cellular attachments with finite boundary support form a CW complex
- Cubical and spherical models of higher homotopy agree
- A map into a product is continuous iff each of its components is; the projections are continuous and open; and each projection is surjective when every factor is nonempty, which for an infinite index set uses the Axiom of Choice
- Heine-Borel in $\mathbb{R}^n$: with the Euclidean metric a subset of $\mathbb{R}^n$ is compact if and only if it is closed and bounded, and the proof by bisection uses no choice principle; the same holds on the real line
- For a metric space with its metric topology, compactness in the topological sense is compactness in the metric sense, and the two notions of compact subset coincide
- The image of a compact metric space under a continuous map is compact, and so is the image of any compact subset
- In a Hausdorff space a point and a disjoint compact set, and two disjoint compact sets, have disjoint open neighbourhoods; hence every compact subset is closed, and in a compact Hausdorff space the compact subsets are exactly the closed ones
- High relative cells do not change lower homotopy
- Based sphere maps are classified by degree
- Higher homotopy classes form groups and are abelian above degree one
- Compact CW images have finite cell support without choice
- Free abelian group on a set
Used by
- First nonzero homotopy group of a sphere Example
- Freudenthal stable range for spheres Example
- Hurewicz calculation for a wedge of simply connected spheres Example
- A relative single cell layer has compatible homotopy and homology bases Lemma
- Cellular reduction for a highly connected pair Lemma
- Integral homology of a wedge of higher spheres has its cell basis Lemma
Dependency tree · two levels
82 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Hatcher, Algebraic Topology, Example4.26 p363; finite sphere-product topology and finite-support proof supplied locally (standard reference, not scraped)