How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The fixed field of Aut(C/Q) is Q
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Choice. The subfield of fixed by every field automorphism with for all is exactly .
Statement references
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Full AC, the field inclusion , and an element .
Under full AC, every algebraically independent subset extends to a maximal algebraically independent set, and a maximal set is a transcendence basis (The Axiom of Choice; A maximal algebraically independent set is a transcendence basis).
The algebraic numbers form an algebraically closed algebraic extension of : roots exist in (The complex numbers are algebraically closed) and remain algebraic over by transitivity (Algebraicity is transitive in towers of field extensions).
Full AC is equivalent over ZF to Zorn's lemma (The Axiom of Choice; The Axiom of Choice and Zorn's lemma are equivalent).
Proof
Let be a field extension with algebraic over , let be an intermediate field, and let be an embedding into an algebraically closed field . Order all extensions with by extension. A chain has the union embedding, so Zorn's lemma from [F3] gives a maximal one. If , choose ; it is algebraic over . Apply to its minimal polynomial and choose a root . The transported minimal polynomial is irreducible over because is an isomorphism onto its image, so sending to extends to an embedding of , contradicting maximality. Hence extends to . If maps onto and both source and target are algebraic closures of , this extension is onto: its image is algebraically closed and contains , so it contains every root of every polynomial over , hence all of .
Use [F2] to view as a subfield of . By [F1], choose a transcendence basis of over . Then is algebraic over and, being algebraically closed, is an algebraic closure of that field.
If is algebraic over but , its irreducible minimal polynomial has degree at least two and has distinct roots because its derivative is nonzero and relatively prime to it. Choose another root . By step 1.1, the embedding sending to extends to an automorphism of over . Extend it coefficientwise to while fixing , then apply step 1.1 to extend it to an automorphism of . This automorphism moves .
If is transcendental over , it is transcendental over the algebraic extension by transitivity in [F2]. Extend to a transcendence basis over using [F1]. The assignment fixing and every element of while sending to defines an automorphism of ; its inverse sends to . By step 1.1 it extends to an automorphism of , and it moves .
Every complex number outside is either algebraic nonrational or transcendental over , and steps 2.1, 2.2 exhibit an automorphism fixing that moves it. Every element of is fixed by definition. Thus the common fixed field is exactly .
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
27 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- J. S. Milne, Fields and Galois Theory, v5.10, §§3 and 9 (standard reference, not scraped)
- The Stacks Project, Section 9.26: Transcendence, Lemma 9.26.3 (standard reference, not scraped)