Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: Literature-sourcedPipeline-generatedprecheck pass
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The two lifts of a self-map carry twice the fixed point index sum

Statement

Let M be a connected closed smooth n-manifold, n≥1, π:M~→M its orientation double cover with deck transformation τ (A smooth local diffeomorphism lifts canonically to the orientation double cover), let f:M→M be smooth with isolated fixed points, and let f~:M~→M~ be a smooth lift of f commuting with τ (π∘f~=f∘π and τ∘f~=f~∘τ); set f~′:=τ∘f~. (Such a lift exists when f is a local diffeomorphism, by the derivative lift; it need not exist for general smooth f.) Then f~ and f~′ have isolated fixed points and finite fixed point sets, and ∑x~∈Fix⁡(f~)ind⁡x~(f~)+∑x~∈Fix⁡(f~′)ind⁡x~(f~′)=2∑x∈Fix⁡(f)ind⁡x(f). More precisely, over each fixed point x of f exactly one of the two lifts has fixed points, it fixes both points of the fibre π−1(x), and each of those two fixed points has local index ind⁡x(f).

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The connected closed smooth n-manifold M, its orientation double cover (M~,π,τ), a smooth f:M→M with isolated fixed points and a τ-commuting lift f~.

[F1]

π is a smooth two-sheeted covering map with deck transformation τ, τ2=id and π∘τ=π; each fibre is {a,τa} with a≠τa; M~ is closed when M is (A smooth local diffeomorphism lifts canonically to the orientation double cover).

[F2]

For an isolated fixed point z of a smooth self-map of a boundaryless n-manifold the local index is defined and unchanged under conjugation by a local diffeomorphism of a neighbourhood of the point (Isolated fixed point and local fixed point index, The local fixed point index is invariant under conjugation by a local diffeomorphism).

[L1]

Fixed points of a self-map are the points whose graph meets the diagonal, and the fixed point set of a smooth self-map of a manifold is closed; a closed discrete subset of a compact space is finite (Fixed points are exactly the intersections of the graph with the diagonal, A closed discrete subset of a compact space is finite).

Proof

1.1givenF1

Fixed points over a fixed point. Let x∈Fix⁡(f) and π−1(x)={a,τa}. Since π(f~(a))=f(π(a))=f(x)=x, the point f~(a) lies in {a,τa}. If f~(a)=a, then f~(τa)=τf~(a)=τa by the commutation, so both fibre points are fixed by f~, while f~′(a)=τ(a)=τa≠a and f~′(τa)=a≠τa; if f~(a)=τa, then f~(τa)=τf~(a)=τ2a=a, so both fibre points are fixed by f~′=τf~ and neither by f~. In both cases exactly two of the four pairs (g~,x~)∈{f~,f~′}×π−1(x) satisfy g~(x~)=x~, namely one lift fixing both points of the fibre. Conversely, a fixed point of f~ or of f~′ projects to a fixed point of f, because π∘f~=f∘π.

2.1step 1.1F1L1

Isolation and finiteness. Let x~ be a fixed point of f~ and x=π(x~). Choose a neighbourhood W of x containing no fixed point of f other than x. Since π is a local homeomorphism and M~ is Hausdorff, choose a neighbourhood W~ of x~ with π(W~)⊆W and τx~∉W~. Any fixed point of f~ in W~ projects into W, hence lies over x, hence is x~ or τx~; the second is excluded by τx~∉W~. So the fixed points of f~ are isolated, and the same argument applies to f~′. Their fixed sets are closed by [L1] and discrete, and M~ is compact by [F1], so both fixed sets are finite by [L1].

3.1step 1.1step 2.1F2given∎

Local indices. Let x~ be a fixed point of f~ with π(x~)=x. Since π is a local diffeomorphism, it restricts to a diffeomorphism from an open neighbourhood of x~ onto an open neighbourhood of x, and from π∘f~=f∘π we get f~=π−1∘f∘π on that neighbourhood; the conjugation lemma [F2] therefore gives ind⁡x~(f~)=ind⁡x(f). The same computation applies to every fixed point of f~′, which also satisfies π∘f~′=f∘π. Step 1.1 says that over each fixed point x of f exactly one of the two lifts has fixed points, and it fixes both points of the fibre, so the total of the local indices of f~ and f~′ over x is 2ind⁡x(f). Summing over the finite set Fix⁡(f) — the geometric Lefschetz number of f is the finite index sum of Geometric Lefschetz number (index sum) — gives the displayed identity.

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

36 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources