How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Countable proper local restrictions of a Fredholm map
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Choice. Let be a Fredholm map, , between Hausdorff second-countable real Banach manifolds. There is a countable family of subsets whose interiors cover . For each there are a source open set and a target chart such that is closed relative to , , is proper, and in coordinates on the map has Fredholm normal form where and the target obstruction coordinate are finite-dimensional. Proper means that the inverse image of each compact subset of is compact. The conclusion includes , with an empty family.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: AC and the map in the statement.
Every point has a normal-form neighbourhood with product source coordinates , where is open in a Banach range space and is open in a finite-dimensional kernel space (Local finite-dimensional reduction for a Fredholm map).
The source is second countable (Countable base Banach manifold and smooth map).
Proof
If is empty, the empty family works. Otherwise fix and use [F1] to obtain , a source coordinate diffeomorphism , and a target chart in which . Write . Choose radii small enough that the closed balls and . Set Then is closed relative to , and its interior in contains .
The restriction is proper. To see this, let be compact and take a sequence in . After a subsequence converges in ; in target coordinates its first components therefore converge to some . The lie in the compact finite-dimensional ball , so a further subsequence converges to . Continuity of and gives . This subset is metrizable through , so sequential compactness implies compactness. The argument uses no compactness of a ball in the Banach range coordinate.
The interiors of the form an open cover of . By [F2], under AC every open cover has a countable subcover: for each member of a countable base that is contained in some cover member, choose one such member. Keep the corresponding countably many , and index them by a subset of . Their interiors still cover , and each retains the properties proved in steps 1.1–2.1.
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
20 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Stephen Smale, An Infinite Dimensional Version of Sard's Theorem, proof of Theorems 1.3 and 1.6, pp. 862-863 (standard reference, not scraped)