Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: Literature-sourcedprecheck pass
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Frobenius divisibility: d omega equals eta wedge omega

Statement

Assume Countable Choice ACω. Let F be a transversely oriented codimension-one foliation of a smooth manifold M with nowhere-vanishing defining 1-form ω, so TF=ker⁡ω. Then ω∧dω=0 and there exists a smooth 1-form η on M with dω=η∧ω. If η′ is another such form, then η′−η=fω for a unique f∈C∞(M).

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A transversely oriented codimension-one foliation F of a smooth manifold M with nowhere-vanishing defining one-form ω, so TF=ker⁡ω, and the standing countable choice assumption.

[F1]

For a nowhere-zero one-form α, the hyperplane distribution ker⁡α is integrable if and only if α∧dα=0. (The codimension-one Frobenius criterion).

[F2]

If ω is nowhere vanishing, then α∧ω=0 for a one-form α forces α=fω for a unique smooth f, and θ∧ω=0 for a two-form θ forces θ=β∧ω for a smooth one-form β. (Divisibility by a nowhere-vanishing one-form).

[F3]

The wedge product of alternating forms is associative and graded-commutative, so for forms of odd degree α∧β=−β∧α. (The wedge product is associative and graded commutative).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1F1F3given

Since F is integrable with TF=ker⁡ω, the Frobenius criterion [F1] gives ω∧dω=0, and by the graded commutativity of [F3] with degrees one and two (and hence sign (−1)1⋅2=1) this is equivalent to dω∧ω=0.

2.1F2step 1.1

Applying the divisibility lemma [F2] to the two-form θ=dω with θ∧ω=0 produces a smooth one-form η with dω=η∧ω.

3.1F2step 2.1∎

If η′ is another one-form with dω=η′∧ω, then (η′−η)∧ω=0, so by part (i) of [F2] there is a unique smooth f with η′−η=fω; evaluating at any vector field X with ω(X)=1 gives f=η′(X)−η(X), which both exhibits f and proves its uniqueness, and no choice principle beyond the standing vocabulary is used.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

25 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources