How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Distinct fusion-ring characters are orthogonal under duality
Statement
Let be a fusion ring over with finite distinguished basis , unit , and duality . If are distinct unital ring homomorphisms, then .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A finite fusion ring with its distinguished basis, duality, and two distinct unital ring characters .
Multiplication has structure constants in the distinguished basis, and Frobenius reciprocity gives (Fusion rules, Fusion and multifusion categories).
A unital ring character is additive, multiplicative, and sends the unit basis element to .
Proof
Given: The data in the Statement.
For a basis element , form in . The coefficient of in is by [F1], after setting . By multiplicativity and the anti-involution identity , this equals , which is the coefficient of in . Hence .
Applying to the equality in step 1.1 gives , where . Since , some has ; subtracting the two sides forces . This is the asserted sum.
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
7 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Etingof, Gelaki, Nikshych, and Ostrik, Tensor Categories, Lemma 8.14.1 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Etingof, Nikshych, and Ostrik, On Fusion Categories, §2.1 (standard reference, not scraped)