Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The modular Hopf-link matrix squares to D² times duality

Statement

Let C be modular under Modular ribbon fusion category and Hopf-link data. Let C be the charge-conjugation matrix, Cij=δi,j∗. Then

s2=D2C.

In particular D2=∑idi2≠0, so either square root D gives an invertible normalized matrix S=s/D with S2=C.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A complex modular ribbon fusion category with the Hopf-link data of Modular ribbon fusion category and Hopf-link data.

[F1]

The characters hi(x)=six/di are unital fusion-ring characters; sij=sji, si∗j∗=sij, and di∗=di (Balancing and the Hopf-link character identity).

[F2]

Distinct unital fusion-ring characters satisfy ∑xχ(x)ψ(x∗)=0 (Distinct fusion-ring characters are orthogonal under duality).

[F3]

di≠0 for every simple label, the unit has d0=1, and Nii∗0=1 (Simple ribbon fusion dimensions are nonzero, Modular ribbon fusion category and Hopf-link data, Rigid object and rigid monoidal category).

Proof

Given: The data in the Statement.

1.1F1F2F3givenalgebra

Since s is invertible, its rows are linearly independent. If hi=hj, then six=dihi(x) and sjx=djhj(x) make the two rows proportional; therefore hi≠hj for distinct labels. For i≠j∗, use symmetry and duality from [F1] to write ∑xsixsxj=∑xsxisx∗j∗=didj∗∑xhi(x)hj∗(x∗). The final sum is zero by [F2], since hi≠hj∗. Hence (s2)ij=0 unless j=i∗.

2.1F1F2F3step 1.1algebra

For the remaining entries, apply the character identity in [F1] with labels i,i∗: ∑xsxisx,i∗=∑wNi,i∗w∑xdxsxw. Since sxw=dwhw(x), the inner sum is dw∑xhw(x)h0(x∗), using h0(x∗)=dx∗=dx. By [F2] this vanishes for w≠0; for w=0 it equals ∑xdx2=D2. Thus the whole sum is Ni,i∗0D2=D2 by [F3].

3.1givenstep 1.1step 2.1algebra∎

Steps 1.1 and 2.1 give s2=D2C. Since C2=I and s is invertible, D2=0 would force s2=0, a contradiction. Thus D2≠0; choosing a square root gives S=s/D, and division of the identity by D2 gives S2=C.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

16 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources