How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Affine quotients by products of general linear groups are algebraic stacks
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Choice. Let be an affine finite-type -scheme with an algebraic action of , allowing . Then the quotient stack , defined by -torsors with equivariant maps to , is an algebraic stack. The morphism from the trivial torsor is a smooth surjective representable atlas, and the diagonal of is representable by affine schemes.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: AC, the affine scheme , and the indicated action of .
Descent data, prestacks and stacks in groupoids over the fppf site: an algebraic stack is a stack in groupoids on the fppf site. The Given quotient-stack definition specifies left -torsors with equivariant maps to , equivariant isomorphisms commuting with those maps, and fppf-local triviality.
Algebraic stacks and their inertia stacks: a stack in groupoids is algebraic if it has a representable diagonal and a smooth surjective representable presentation by a scheme.
The general linear group scheme and its coordinate ring and Every finite-type characteristic-zero group scheme is smooth: each is affine of finite type, with trivial; hence their product is affine of finite type and smooth over .
Faithfully flat descent of modules and affine algebras is effective: an affine scheme with faithfully flat descent datum is effective, so a -torsor, locally isomorphic to , is represented by a scheme; affineness descends.
The Axiom of Choice: AC is inherited through the algebraic-stack and affine-descent suppliers; the torsor and equalizer constructions below make no additional choices.
Proof
Let correspond to a left torsor and an equivariant map . An object of is a point and an equivariant isomorphism from the trivial left torsor to , compatible with . Such an isomorphism is determined by the image of the identity, and sends to ; the compatibility condition forces . Thus . Since is a torsor, it is a smooth surjective scheme morphism by [F3] and the local triviality in [F1]. Hence is a representable smooth surjective atlas.
For two objects and over a scheme , their isomorphism functor is the subfunctor of on which . After a common fppf cover trivializing both torsors, and after restricting to affine opens of the cover, . With the chosen trivializing sections , the condition is the inverse image of the diagonal under the two evaluation maps . The diagonal of affine is closed, so this is a closed subscheme of , affine over . The isomorphism functor therefore has affine local representatives with their canonical descent data; [F4] makes this affine descent datum effective. Thus the isomorphism functor is represented by an affine scheme over , which proves the diagonal is affine, hence representable.
The torsor-with-map construction is a category fibred in groupoids by pullback. To verify the stack condition, take an fppf cover of and torsors with equivariant maps and compatible isomorphisms on its overlaps. The torsors are affine over their bases by [F4]. On affine opens of , refine the cover by faithfully flat affine covers and apply the effective algebra descent of [F4]; its full faithfulness glues these descended affine schemes on overlaps. The action, torsor isomorphism , and maps to descend as scheme morphisms by [F1]. Their equivariance and compatibility identities can be checked after the cover, and the resulting is fppf-locally the given torsor, hence is a torsor. Compatible isomorphisms descend uniquely in the same way, with inverses descending too. Thus morphisms form sheaves and every object descent datum is effective, exactly the stack condition of [F1].
By steps 1.1–1.3, the quotient stack has a smooth surjective representable atlas and representable diagonal. Step 1.3 establishes the stack condition, so the criterion in [F2] applies and is an algebraic stack. The inherited AC appears only in [A1] through those defining suppliers.
Depends on
- Algebraic stacks and their inertia stacks
- Descent data, prestacks and stacks in groupoids over the fppf site
- Morphisms representable by algebraic spaces
- Smooth morphism of schemes
- The general linear group scheme and its coordinate ring
- Every finite-type characteristic-zero group scheme is smooth
- Faithfully flat descent of modules and affine algebras is effective
- The Axiom of Choice
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
50 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- The Stacks Project, Algebraic Stacks, §§94.10–94.12 (standard reference, not scraped)
- J. S. Milne, Algebraic Groups, corrected 2022 printing, §2.8 (standard reference, not scraped)