Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck pass
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Affine quotients by products of general linear groups are algebraic stacks

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice. Let X be an affine finite-type C-scheme with an algebraic action of G=∏r=1mGL⁡nr,C, allowing nr=0. Then the quotient stack [X/G], defined by G-torsors with equivariant maps to X, is an algebraic stack. The morphism X→[X/G] from the trivial torsor is a smooth surjective representable atlas, and the diagonal of [X/G] is representable by affine schemes.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: AC, the affine scheme X, and the indicated action of G.

[F1]

Descent data, prestacks and stacks in groupoids over the fppf site: an algebraic stack is a stack in groupoids on the fppf site. The Given quotient-stack definition specifies left G-torsors with equivariant maps to X, equivariant isomorphisms commuting with those maps, and fppf-local triviality.

[F2]

Algebraic stacks and their inertia stacks: a stack in groupoids is algebraic if it has a representable diagonal and a smooth surjective representable presentation by a scheme.

[F3]

The general linear group scheme and its coordinate ring and Every finite-type characteristic-zero group scheme is smooth: each GL⁡nr,C is affine of finite type, with GL⁡0 trivial; hence their product G is affine of finite type and smooth over C.

[F4]

Faithfully flat descent of modules and affine algebras is effective: an affine scheme with faithfully flat descent datum is effective, so a G-torsor, locally isomorphic to G, is represented by a scheme; affineness descends.

[A1]

The Axiom of Choice: AC is inherited through the algebraic-stack and affine-descent suppliers; the torsor and equalizer constructions below make no additional choices.

Proof

technique · direct
1.1F1F3givenconstruct

Let T→[X/G] correspond to a left torsor P→T and an equivariant map ϕ:P→X. An object of X×[X/G]T is a point x∈X and an equivariant isomorphism from the trivial left torsor to P, compatible with ϕ. Such an isomorphism is determined by the image p∈P of the identity, and sends g to gp; the compatibility condition forces x=ϕ(p). Thus X×[X/G]T≅P. Since P→T is a torsor, it is a smooth surjective scheme morphism by [F3] and the local triviality in [F1]. Hence X→[X/G] is a representable smooth surjective atlas.

1.2F1F4givenconstruct

For two objects (P,ϕ) and (P′,ϕ′) over a scheme T, their isomorphism functor is the subfunctor of Isom⁡G(P,P′) on which ϕ′∘f=ϕ. After a common fppf cover trivializing both torsors, and after restricting to affine opens of the cover, Isom⁡G(P,P′)≅G×T. With the chosen trivializing sections p,p′, the condition is the inverse image of the diagonal X↪X×X under the two evaluation maps f↦(ϕ′(f(p)),ϕ(p)). The diagonal of affine X is closed, so this is a closed subscheme of G×T, affine over T. The isomorphism functor therefore has affine local representatives with their canonical descent data; [F4] makes this affine descent datum effective. Thus the isomorphism functor is represented by an affine scheme over T, which proves the diagonal is affine, hence representable.

1.3F1F4construct

The torsor-with-map construction is a category fibred in groupoids by pullback. To verify the stack condition, take an fppf cover of T and torsors with equivariant maps and compatible isomorphisms on its overlaps. The torsors are affine over their bases by [F4]. On affine opens of T, refine the cover by faithfully flat affine covers and apply the effective algebra descent of [F4]; its full faithfulness glues these descended affine schemes on overlaps. The action, torsor isomorphism G×P≃P×TP, and maps to X descend as scheme morphisms by [F1]. Their equivariance and compatibility identities can be checked after the cover, and the resulting P→T is fppf-locally the given torsor, hence is a torsor. Compatible isomorphisms descend uniquely in the same way, with inverses descending too. Thus morphisms form sheaves and every object descent datum is effective, exactly the stack condition of [F1].

2.1A1F2step 1.1step 1.2step 1.3∎

By steps 1.1–1.3, the quotient stack has a smooth surjective representable atlas and representable diagonal. Step 1.3 establishes the stack condition, so the criterion in [F2] applies and [X/G] is an algebraic stack. The inherited AC appears only in [A1] through those defining suppliers.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

50 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources