Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedverified 2026-09-24 (gpt-6-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The generic radical on a Shapovalov factor hyperplane

Statement

Fix α∈Φ+ and n∈Z>0, and let Hα,n={λ:⟨λ+ρ,α∨⟩=n}. Suppose Hα,n is a factor hyperplane of at least one Shapovalov determinant. Outside a countable union of proper affine subspaces of Hα,n, put μ=λ−nα. Then M(μ) is simple, there is a unique one-dimensional space of maps M(μ)→M(λ), every nonzero such map is injective, and its image is the entire Shapovalov radical J(λ). Consequently M(λ)/M(μ)=L(λ) is simple and

dim⁡ker⁡Sλ∣M(λ)λ−β=K(β−nα)

for every β∈Q+, with K(η)=0 outside Q+.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A factor hyperplane as in Preliminary factorization of a Shapovalov determinant and a point λ chosen as in the Statement.

[F1]

The radical is the unique maximal proper submodule (The Shapovalov radical is the maximal submodule), and a nonzero Verma submodule contains a singular vector (Every nonzero Verma submodule contains a singular vector).

[F2]

A singular vector gives a Verma homomorphism (The universal property of Verma modules), every nonzero such homomorphism is injective (A nonzero homomorphism between Verma modules is injective), and maps from a simple Verma into another Verma form a space of dimension at most one (Homomorphisms from a simple Verma module have dimension at most one).

[F3]

The Casimir acts on a cyclic highest-weight module of highest weight η by (η,η+2ρ) (The quadratic Casimir eigenvalue on a highest-weight module is (λ,λ+2ρ)), and Verma weights lie below their highest weight (Weights of a Verma module lie below lambda).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

For 0<γ∈Q+ let Hγ be the affine equation 2(λ+ρ,γ)=(γ,γ). When restricted to Hα,n=Hnα, the equation Hγ is identically satisfied only for γ=nα: equality of its linear directions forces γ=cα, and then its constant term forces c=n. For M(μ), a possible Casimir equality at lower weight μ−γ gives 2(λ−nα+ρ,γ)=(γ,γ). This is never an identity on Hα,n: if γ=cα with c>0, the left side there is −cn(α,α) while the right side is c2(α,α)>0. Thus all undesired intersections are proper affine subspaces.

givenF3algebra
2.1

There are countably many γ∈Q+, so omit the intersections in step 1.1. Their union cannot cover the complex affine space Hα,n: in dimension one it excludes only countably many points, and induction on dimension first chooses the preceding coordinates outside the countably many equations independent of the last coordinate, then chooses the last coordinate outside countably many points. For dimension zero step 1.1 says every omitted intersection is empty. We henceforth use such a λ. At this point the only possible non-highest singular weight in M(λ) is μ, and M(μ) has no non-highest singular weight.

step 1.1F3algebra
3.1

If M(μ) had a nonzero proper submodule, [F1] would give a singular vector below μ; its Casimir equality contradicts step 2.1. Thus M(μ) is simple. Since a determinant is divisible by the equation of Hα,n, it vanishes at λ, so J(λ) is nonzero. Choose a weight in J(λ) of minimum height below λ; its vector is singular, and step 2.1 forces its weight to be μ. By [F2] it gives an injective map M(μ)↪J(λ).

F1F2F3step 2.1
4.1

The radical has no weight of height smaller than ht⁡(nα) below λ, since its minimum-height weight in that range would be singular and step 2.1 would force weight μ. Hence every vector of J(λ)μ is singular. The universal property and [F2] show dim⁡J(λ)μ≤1; the embedded source supplies equality.

F1F2step 2.1step 3.1
5.1

Suppose J(λ)/M(μ)≠0. It is a weight module with support below λ and a weight of minimum height; a vector there is singular in the quotient. The Casimir still acts by the scalar of M(λ), so [F3] and step 2.1 force this vector to have weight μ. But step 4.1 says the quotient has zero μ-space, a contradiction. Thus the embedded M(μ) equals J(λ), and the quotient is the simple L(λ).

F3step 2.1step 4.1contradiction
6.1

The uniqueness of the map up to scalar follows from [F2] and its existence. PBW gives dim⁡M(μ)μ−η=K(η); the image at target weight λ−β has η=β−nα. Since the image is the radical, it is precisely the kernel of the restricted Shapovalov form.

F2step 5.1algebra∎

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

21 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources