How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Graded C_n modules and ungraded C_(n−1) modules
Statement
For , taking the even part is an equivalence from finite-dimensional graded -modules to finite-dimensional ungraded -modules, where . An inverse is induction from the even subalgebra. For , retain both parity types and treat the restriction cokernel separately.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: and a finite-dimensional graded left -module or a finite-dimensional ungraded left module over .
A graded Clifford module has (Real graded Clifford-module bundles and their Grothendieck groups).
The even subalgebra of the negative-square algebra is isomorphic to (Even subalgebras of real and complex Clifford algebras).
is finite-dimensional and has its even/odd word grading (PBW basis and exterior associated graded for a Clifford algebra).
retains the even and odd dimension coordinates separately (Clifford-module restriction cokernels A_n).
Proof
Let be the last standard generator. It is odd and invertible because . Multiplication by maps bijectively onto , with inverse multiplication by ; thus . By [F2], the action of on makes it an ungraded -module.
Define , with parity inherited from and the -action transported along the algebra isomorphism in [F2]. Because as a right -module, its even part is canonically and its odd part is . Hence is finite-dimensional and taking its even part returns .
For , define evaluation by . It is well-defined because for . On the even part it is the canonical isomorphism . On the odd part it sends to ; this is bijective since has inverse . Therefore evaluation is an even graded -module isomorphism.
The restriction functor and induction are inverse up to the natural isomorphisms in steps 2.1 and 2.2, so they give an equivalence. At , is purely even; a one-dimensional module concentrated in odd parity has even part zero, while a one-dimensional even module has even part . Thus the same equivalence fails at , and the two parity generators must remain distinct in .
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
16 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- M. F. Atiyah, R. Bott, and A. Shapiro, Clifford Modules, Topology 3, Supplement 1 (1964) (standard reference, not scraped)
- Jost-Hinrich Eschenburg and Bernhard Hanke, Bott–Thom isomorphism, Hopf bundles and Morse theory (2021) (standard reference, not scraped)
- M. F. Atiyah, K-Theory (lectures, notes by D. W. Anderson, 1967), with K-Theory and Reality reprint (standard reference, not scraped)