Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-09
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Finite normal quotients preserve ball growth

Statement

For a finite generating set S of a group G, finite normal F, and q:GG/F, one has BqS(n)BS(n)FBqS(n) for every integer n0. Balls use generators and their inverses.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: FG is finite, S is finite and generates G, and n0.

[F1]

Word length is the minimum number of generator or inverse letters (Word length of a group element with respect to a generating set).

Proof

1.1

An S-word of length at most n projects to a qS-word of that length. Conversely, lift each letter in a qS-word to a corresponding letter of SS1; their product lies in BS(n) and projects to its value. Only finitely many letters of this particular word need lifts. Therefore q(BS(n))=BqS(n).

F1given
2.1

Each fiber of q is a coset of F, with exactly F elements. Its intersection with BS(n) has at most F elements and, over BqS(n), at least one by step 1.1. Summing over the finite target ball yields both inequalities. At n=0 both balls contain only the identity, and 11F. For F=1 both inequalities are equalities; the empty generating set gives the trivial group.

F2step 1.1

Source notes

Druţu–Kapovich, Geometric Group Theory (837-page edition), Theorem 14.26 finite-kernel reduction, printed p.511; direct fiber-count proof. The finite-quotient growth reduction in revised Theorem 14.26 is replaced by exact ball images and finite fiber cardinalities. No later quasi-isometry invariance theorem is used.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

16 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources