Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-09
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Coordinate boxes and word balls have matching size

Statement

For a fixed mixed lower-central coordinate system of a finitely generated nilpotent group G and fixed finite generating set S, there exist a,b>0 such that Q(an)BS(n)Q(bn) for all sufficiently large integers n. For real R1, Q(R)=i=1c(2Ri+1)rii,j: dij<dij. Consequently BS(n) is between positive multiples of nD(G).

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Q(R) uses all canonical finite residues and the chosen free coordinate bounds; G and S are fixed.

[F1]

Mixed lower-central coordinates are unique (Finite lower-central coordinate systems with torsion accounted for).

[F2]

Weighted words collect with coordinate bounds O(R^i), with all earlier coordinates zero in the last term (Weighted collection with finite-order carries).

[F3]

Last-term elements of intrinsic length O(R^c) have ambient length O(R) (Both bounds for last-term weighted distortion).

[F4]

Proof

1.1

A word of length at most n has layer-i free exponents at most Cmax(1,n)i by F2. Choose b>=1 such that biC for all finitely many i. Then for n1 every such integer exponent is at most (bn)i in absolute value; its residues are allowed in Q. Thus BS(n)Q(bn).

F2given
1.2

We prove Q(R)BS(KR) for R1 by induction on class. For G=1 the empty tuple represents only 1. For class one, if g=ujajvjbj is in Q(R), repeating fixed S-words for the u_j costs at most RujS, and the finite residues cost at most (dj1)vjS. Since R1 this is at most KR.

F1given
2.1

For class c2 put H=γc(G). The coordinate system truncated before layer c is a mixed coordinate system of G/H: for i<c the subgroup H lies in γi+1, so those quotient factors are unchanged. For g in Q(R), its image lies in the quotient box. By induction it has a word of length at most K_0 R in the quotient generators; lift its letters to an S-word w with the same length. The element h=w1g lies in H. An explicit weighted word for it is the reversed inverse S-word for w followed by the ordered coordinate word for g. In weight i this has at most λRi letters for a fixed lambda: w contributes only O(R) weight-one letters, the free powers contribute O(R^i), and finite residues contribute fixed bounded counts.

step 1.2algebra
3.1

Apply F2 to that weighted word. Since h is in H, only last-layer coordinates remain; their free exponents are O(R^c), with bounded residues. The corresponding coordinate generators are a finite generating set of the abelian H, so hHK1Rc after increasing K_1. F3 gives hSK2R+K22K2R. If H is finite its fixed ambient diameter gives the same conclusion. Hence gS=whS(K0+2K2)R, completing the induction. Taking K>=1 and a=1/K gives Q(an)BS(n) whenever an1.

F2F3step 2.1
4.1

By uniqueness, every permitted tuple represents a different element. A free weight-i coordinate has exactly 2Ri+1 possible values, and a residue coordinate has d possible values, independently. This proves the product formula, including the empty product 1. For R1, Ri2Ri+13Ri. Thus with T=dij and h=ri, TRD(G)Q(R)T3hRD(G). Combining the two box inclusions gives positive upper and lower multiples of nD(G) for all sufficiently large n. If all ranks vanish, Q(R) has the constant size T and the same argument gives degree zero.

F1F4step 1.1step 3.1

Source notes

Druţu–Kapovich, Geometric Group Theory (837-page edition), Proposition 14.25 and Theorem 14.26, pp.510–512; two-sided box inclusion proved by the stated local induction. Revised Proposition 14.25 provides controlled normal forms. The converse inclusion is proved locally by quotient lifting and a compressed central correction; uniqueness, not redundant alphabets, justifies counting.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

19 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources