Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Colored RSK and the multipartition square count

Statement

Let fλ=∣Std⁡(λ)∣ for an r-multipartition λ of n. There is an explicit bijection between r-colored permutations (σ,κ)∈Sn×{1,…,r}n and pairs (P,Q) of standard multitableaux of a common shape. Its forward map scans positions i=1,…,n: if κi=c, row-insert the value σ(i) into component c of P and place the recording label i in the new box of component c of Q. Its inverse scans i=n,n−1,…,1: find the unique component whose recording tableau contains i, delete that recording corner, and reverse-row-delete the corresponding box of its insertion tableau to recover σ(i); the component is κi. Consequently,

∑λ∈Pr(n)(fλ)2=rnn!.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The row-insertion and reverse-row-deletion maps of The Robinson-Schensted correspondence, and the definition of standard multitableaux of Multipartitions, standard multitableaux, and generic contents.

[F1]

For any finite word of distinct entries, ordinary row insertion produces a standard insertion tableau and a standard recording tableau of the same shape. Repeated reverse-row-deletion at the recording label m,m−1,…,1 recovers the original word; the largest recording entry lies at a removable corner. (The Robinson-Schensted correspondence)

[F2]

An r-multipartition of n is a tuple of r ordinary diagrams with total size n, and a standard multitableau is a standard filling in each component using the labels 1,…,n exactly once across all components. (Multipartitions, standard multitableaux, and generic contents)

Proof

Given: A colored permutation (σ,κ)∈Sn×[r]n, or a pair of standard multitableaux (P,Q) of a common shape.

1.1F1F2

For each color c, take the subsequence of values σ(i) with κi=c, in increasing order of their positions i. If its values are not 1,…,m in that order, replace them by their increasing ranks before applying ordinary row insertion. The insertion and reverse-deletion routes use only comparisons, so this order-preserving relabelling leaves every bumping position unchanged; after reverse deletion, replace ranks by the original values in the same order. Thus [F1] gives standard insertion and recording tableaux of the same shape for every color subsequence, including an arbitrary subset of {1,…,n}. At the step for position i, record i in the new box of Q(c). Their entries across components are the values 1,…,n once in P, and the positions 1,…,n once in Q, so P,Q are standard multitableaux of the same multipartition. This is the stated forward map.

1.2F1F2

To invert, begin with standard multitableaux (P,Q) of common shape. At global step i=n,n−1,…,1, there is exactly one component c with recording entry i. Since every recording component is standard and all larger global labels have already been removed, i is the largest entry in the current Q(c) and occupies a removable corner. Remove that box from Q(c). In P(c), replace the current set of distinct values by their increasing ranks, reverse-row-delete the same corner, and replace the expelled rank by the corresponding original value; this works because both bumping and reverse deletion use only comparisons. Define that value to be σ(i) and set κi=c. The process is defined at every step and ends with empty tableaux.

2.1step 1.1step 1.2F1

Starting with a colored permutation and applying the inverse just defined deletes, in each component, its recording boxes in reverse time order. The inverse identity in [F1] expels exactly the value inserted at that position, so it recovers every σ(i) and the component records every κi. Conversely, starting from (P,Q) and reversing, each expelled value is reinserted into the same component at the same recording time; the insertion/reverse-deletion identity of [F1] restores that component and its new box. Induction over i therefore restores the original pair. Thus the two algorithms are mutually inverse.

3.1step 2.1F2algebra∎

There are n! permutations of 1,…,n and independently r choices of color at each of the n positions, hence rnn! colored permutations. The bijection of step 2.1 sends them to the disjoint union over shapes λ of pairs of standard multitableaux of shape λ, whose number is ∑λ(fλ)2. This proves the square count.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

13 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources