Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Every comodule element lies in a finite-dimensional subcomodule

Statement

Assume AC. Let C be a coalgebra over a field k, let (M,ρ) be a right C-comodule, and let m∈M. Then m belongs to a finite-dimensional subcomodule of M. If C is finite-dimensional, the same conclusion follows without AC.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A field k, a coalgebra C with comultiplication Δ and counit ε, a right comodule (M,ρ), and m∈M.

[F1]

The coaction satisfies (ρ⊗id⁡C)ρ=(id⁡M⊗Δ)ρ and (id⁡M⊗ε)ρ=id⁡M. A subcomodule is an injective comodule map, identified with its image after the induced coaction is constructed. (Right comodules, comodule maps, and subcomodules)

[F2]

Every tensor is a finite sum of elementary tensors, and iterated tensor products are re-associated through the stated associators. (Scalars, tensor powers, the empty tensor, opposite algebras and finite sums, Associator naturality, pentagon, unit triangle and symmetry hexagons on elementary tensors)

[F3]

If c1,…,cr are linearly independent in a vector space C and ∑ici⊗xi=0, then every xi=0 under AC; if C is finite-dimensional, this coefficient-separation claim is choice-free. (Coefficient separation for an independent family of vectors, with explicit Choice assumptions)

[F4]

Under AC, tensoring an injection by id⁡C is injective and, for the quotient π:M→M/W, ker⁡(π⊗id⁡C) is the image of W⊗C. (Tensoring injections and the kernel of a tensor product of quotient maps over a field)

[F5]

A subspace spanned by a finite list has a finite basis: the list contains a basis of its span, without choice, and a vector space is finite-dimensional exactly when it has a finite basis. (A finite spanning list contains a basis, without choice, Finite-dimensional vector space, and its dimension dim⁡FV; infinite-dimensional means having no finite basis)

[A1]

AC holds for the arbitrary-dimensional branch. (The Axiom of Choice)

Proof

Given: The objects above; assume [A1] for the general coalgebra case. The separate finite-dimensional-C branch will not use [A1].

1.1givenF1F2F5choose

If m=0, let W={0} with its zero coaction; both coaction equations are zero equalities, so it is a finite-dimensional subcomodule containing m. Otherwise write ρ(m)=∑s=1rxs⊗ds as a finite tensor by [F2]. Let D=span⁡{d1,…,dr}. The choice-free basis-extraction result [F5] gives a finite basis c1,…,cq of D; express each ds in that basis and collect terms to obtain ρ(m)=∑i=1qvi⊗ci with the ci linearly independent. Set W=span⁡{v1,…,vq}, which has a finite basis and is therefore finite-dimensional by [F5].

2.1givenF1F2step 1.1construct

Coassociativity applied to this expansion gives ∑iρ(vi)⊗ci=∑ivi⊗Δ(ci). Let π:M→M/W be the quotient and apply π⊗id⁡C⊗id⁡C; the right side is zero since every vi∈W, so ∑i((π⊗id⁡C)ρ(vi))⊗ci=0 in ((M/W)⊗C)⊗C.

3.1A1F3F4step 2.1algebra

Apply the associator and symmetry to rewrite the last equality as ∑ici⊗((π⊗id⁡)ρ(vi))=0. The ci are independent, so [F3] gives (π⊗id⁡)ρ(vi)=0 for every i. By [F4], each ρ(vi) lies in the image of W⊗C→M⊗C. Therefore ρ(W) lies in that image.

3.2F1F2F3F5step 1.1step 2.1

Now suppose C is finite-dimensional, without assuming AC. The construction in step 1.1 still gives W and independent ci. Coassociativity and the quotient map give the zero tensor equality of step 2.1. The finite-dimensional clause of [F3] therefore gives (π⊗id⁡)ρ(vi)=0 for each i.

4.1A1F1F4step 1.1step 3.1algebra

The inclusion i:W↪M tensored with C is injective by [A1] and [F4]. Hence each ρ(w) for w∈W has a unique lift ρW(w)∈W⊗C; uniqueness makes w↦ρW(w) linear and (i⊗id⁡)ρW=ρi. The map i⊗id⁡C⊗id⁡C is also injective. Applying it to (ρW⊗id⁡)ρW gives (ρ⊗id⁡)(i⊗id⁡)ρW=(ρ⊗id⁡)ρi; applying it to (id⁡W⊗Δ)ρW gives (id⁡M⊗Δ)(i⊗id⁡)ρW=(id⁡M⊗Δ)ρi. These are equal by coassociativity of M, so injectivity proves coassociativity on W. Also i(id⁡W⊗ε)ρW=(id⁡M⊗ε)(i⊗id⁡)ρW=(id⁡M⊗ε)ρi=i; injectivity of i proves counitality. Thus (W,ρW) is a finite-dimensional subcomodule. Finally m=(id⁡M⊗ε)ρ(m)=∑iviε(ci)∈W by [F1].

4.2F1F2F5F6step 1.1step 2.1step 3.2algebra

Since C is finite-dimensional, [F5] and Finite-dimensional vector space, and its dimension dim⁡FV; infinite-dimensional means having no finite basis give a finite basis d1,…,dt of C. Write λs(c) for the unique sth coordinate of c∈C from [F6]. For a,b∈k and c,c′∈C, uniqueness of coordinates and the vector-space laws give λs(ac+bc′)=aλs(c)+bλs(c′), so each λs is linear; write ds∗:=λs. Write ρ(vi)=∑sys⊗ds. Applying π⊗id⁡ and then id⁡⊗ds∗ gives π(ys)=0, hence each ys∈W; so ρ(vi) is in the image of W⊗C. The inclusion W⊗C→M⊗C is injective without AC here: if ∑sws⊗ds maps to zero, applying id⁡M⊗ds∗ gives ws=0 for each s. Thus the coaction lifts uniquely and linearly to W. Writing i:W↪M for the inclusion, expand each elementary tensor in the two finite C-coordinates to write any z∈W⊗C⊗C as z=∑s,uwsu⊗ds⊗du by [F2]. If its image in M⊗C⊗C is zero, apply id⁡M⊗ds∗⊗du∗, with the canonical tensor-unit identifications, to obtain i(wsu)=0 for every s,u; injectivity of i gives wsu=0 and hence z=0. Thus the threefold inclusion is injective without invoking a product-basis theorem or AC. Applying this inclusion to the two coaction composites on W gives the corresponding composites on M, which agree by coassociativity; hence coassociativity holds on W. Likewise, applying W↪M to its counit composite gives the identity on W by counitality on M, and injectivity gives counitality on W. Finally, step 2.1 and counitality directly give m=(id⁡M⊗ε)ρ(m)=∑iviε(ci)∈W.

5.1step 1.1step 2.1step 3.1step 4.1step 3.2step 4.2∎

Steps 1.1, 2.1, 3.1, and 4.1 prove the arbitrary-C case under AC; steps 2.1, 3.2, and 4.2 prove the finite-dimensional-C case without AC. In both cases the exhibited W is finite-dimensional and is a subcomodule containing m.

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

57 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources