Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The rational spin-1/2 spectral R-matrix satisfies Yang-Baxter

Statement

Let V, R(u), Rij(u), and Rˇj(u) be as in The rational spin-1/2 spectral R-matrix. For arbitrary x,y,z∈C, set u=x−y, v=y−z, and w=x−z=u+v. In End⁡C(V⊗3) the un-checked operators satisfy

R12(u)R13(w)R23(v)=R23(v)R13(w)R12(u).

The checked operators also satisfy the braid-form spectral identity

Rˇ1(u)Rˇ2(w)Rˇ1(v)=Rˇ2(v)Rˇ1(w)Rˇ2(u).

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The fixed space V=C2 and the endomorphisms defined in The rational spin-1/2 spectral R-matrix, together with arbitrary x,y,z∈C.

[F1]

The rational spin-1/2 spectral R-matrix: P12, P13, and P23 act on the standard tensor basis by the corresponding transpositions; Rij(t)=tI+iPij and Rˇ1(t)=tP12+iI, Rˇ2(t)=tP23+iI.

Proof

1.1givenF1algebra

Write s=P12, t=P13, and r=P23. On each basis tensor ea⊗eb⊗ec, the products st, tr, and rs all give eb⊗ec⊗ea; the products sr, rt, and ts all give ec⊗ea⊗eb; and str and rts both give ec⊗eb⊗ea. Also srs and rsr both give ec⊗eb⊗ea, while s2=r2=I. Since the eight elementary tensors form a basis, these are equalities of endomorphisms.

2.1givenF1step 1.1algebra

Expand the left side of the un-checked identity as uwvI+i(wvs+uvt+uwr)−(vst+wsr+utr)−istr. Expand the right side as uwvI+i(wvs+uvt+uwr)−(urt+wrs+vts)−irts. By step 1.1, put A=st=tr=rs and B=sr=rt=ts; then the left quadratic term is −(u+v)A−wB=−w(A+B), and the right quadratic term is −wA−(u+v)B=−w(A+B). The scalar, linear, and cubic terms agree as well, using u+v=w and str=rts. This proves the un-checked identity.

3.1givenF1step 1.1algebra∎

The checked left side expands to i(uv−1)I−w(s+r)+iw(usr+vrs)+uvwsrs. The checked right side expands to i(uv−1)I−w(s+r)+iw(vrs+usr)+uvwrsr. These expressions agree by step 1.1 and w=u+v, proving the checked identity.

Diagram

Read each arrow label as a composite of endomorphisms, with the rightmost factor applied first. The two arrows have the same source and target; this is a notation diagram for the checked identity above, not part of its proof.

V¬3V¬3∙R1(u)∙R2(u+v)∙R1(v)∙R2(v)∙R1(u+v)∙R2(u)

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

3 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources