How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Highest-weight characters are unitriangular in Weyl orbit sums
Statement
For a finite-dimensional complex semisimple Lie algebra with a fixed Cartan and positive system, let be the finite-dimensional simple module of dominant integral highest weight . Its formal character is . Then where the coefficients are nonnegative integers and the support is finite. The inverse expansion expressing in these characters has integral coefficients, coefficient one at , and finite support on the same dominant ideal. In particular the characters form a basis of . All statements include singular dominant weights and rank zero, without AC.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The indicated Cartan, positive system and formal character.
The modules exist, are finite-dimensional, have one-dimensional top and support in , and their weight multiplicities are -invariant, by Finite semisimple PBW and highest-weight construction.
Orbit sums form the invariant basis, are indexed uniquely by dominant weights, and each dominant ideal below a fixed dominant weight is finite by Weyl orbit sums form a basis of finite Weyl invariants.
The group algebra and distinct-element orbit-sum convention are Weyl orbit sum in a group algebra.
Proof
By F1 the character is a finite sum with nonnegative integral coefficients constant on each Weyl orbit, hence lies in . F2 and F3 group these coefficients into orbit sums with the same nonnegative integral coefficient at each orbit. If its dominant representative occurs, then itself is a support weight and F1 gives . The orbit of has coefficient one because the top space is one-dimensional. Every other dominant representative is distinct from , so is strictly below it. This proves exactly the displayed expansion, including its finiteness.
Fix and let . It is finite by F2 and is downward closed among dominant weights by transitivity of addition. On its finite free span with basis , step 1.1 gives the character change-of-basis matrix , where strictly lowers this partial order and has integer entries. A product of strictly lowering entries would require a chain of distinct points in , which is impossible; hence . Its inverse is the finite integer matrix . It has diagonal one and only lower entries. This proves the asserted finite inverse on each ideal.
F2 says every invariant is a finite combination of orbit sums. Replacing each by its finite inverse expansion in step 2.1 proves character spanning. A finite relation among characters is supported in the union of finitely many finite dominant ideals; the same nilpotent triangular argument on that finite downward-closed union proves independence. Distinct-element orbit sums ensure no stabilizer factor appears at a wall weight. For rank zero only exists, and ; for the dominant ideal is the singleton by F2's norm bound. All matrices and sums used are finite and no AC is involved.
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
9 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Pavel Etingof, Lie Groups and Lie Algebras, §§25–26; local orbit-sum triangular inversion (standard reference, not scraped)