Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generatedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-12
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Kostant harmonics give an invariant polynomial complement

Statement

For every finite-dimensional complex semisimple Lie algebra g, let S=S(g), R=Sg, I=SR+ and let H be its Kostant harmonic subspace. Then Sd=HdId(d0),S=HSS+g. The splitting is graded and g-equivariant. This includes g=0 and is choice-free.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The indicated semisimple Lie algebra and symmetric adjoint action.

[F1]

The bilinear Killing Fischer pairing is perfect and symmetric in each degree, Hd=Id, and both I and H are graded and adjoint stable, by Kostant harmonic subspace of the symmetric algebra.

[F2]

Cartan and root decomposition, the positive real coroot span, one-dimensional root spaces, exact nonzero root strings and simple-triple generation are Finite semisimple Cartan, root and string structure.

[F3]

The explicit rank-one string formulas, including positive raising/lowering compositions between adjacent weights, are Finite Lie triangularization and rank-one complete reducibility.

Proof

1.1

Fix a Cartan, positive roots and normalized simple triples ei,fi,hi from F2. Write aij=αj(hi); these are real integers, and the αi and hi are bases. Construct an auxiliary Lie algebra C as follows, without any presentation theorem for g. Take the vector space on all finite formally bracketed words in the finite symbols ei,fi,hi, give it the bilinear grafting bracket, and quotient by the ideal generated by antisymmetry and Jacobi. Evaluation of words gives the free universal Lie property directly. Quotient further by [hi,hj]=0, [hi,ej]=aijej, [hi,fj]=aijfj, [ei,fj]=δijhi. All these relations hold for the chosen triples: for ij, αiαj is not a root because its simple coefficients have opposite signs. Hence evaluation gives a surjection π:Cg by simple generation. The span C0 of the hi injects under π, because their images are a basis of h.

F2givenalgebra
2.1

Let C+,C be the subalgebras generated by the ei,fi. Jacobi expresses every bracket word in one sign as a sum of words [ei,u], or respectively [fi,u], with u shorter: repeatedly apply [[a,b],c]=[a,[b,c]][b,[a,c]] to shorten the left entry. The same identity and the relations in step 1.1 prove inductively that [fi,C+]C0+C+, with the bracket in C+ for positive word length greater than one; the length-one case lies in C0. Indeed [fi,[ej,u]]=δij[hi,u]+[ej,[fi,u]], and the induction handles the last bracket. Reversing signs proves [ei,C]C0+C. Bracketing with hi preserves each half by the product rule. Thus C+C0+C+ is stable under every generator, contains them, and by the same bracket-word reduction contains all of C.

step 1.1algebra
3.1

Give the generators degrees αi,αi,0 in the free abelian group on the simple roots. Every defining relation is homogeneous, so the quotient has a direct grading. Step 2.1 shows all nonzero degrees have either entirely nonnegative or entirely nonpositive simple coordinates, and the degree-zero space is exactly C0. Induction with Jacobi gives [hi,u]=γ(hi)u in degree γ. Distinct degrees have distinct joint weights because the simple roots form a basis of h. Every ideal JC is graded: for an element with finite homogeneous support, choose a linear combination of the hi separating those finitely many weights, and use its finite interpolation polynomials to project that element onto each component within J. A separating combination exists because finitely many nonzero linear polynomials cannot vanish on every point: restrict them to a polynomial curve in a finite basis and avoid finitely many scalar roots.

step 1.1step 2.1F2algebra
4.1

The sum K of all ideals J satisfying JC0=0 is an ideal with the same property: by step 3.1 each such ideal has zero degree-zero component, as does every finite sum of its elements. This is a sum over a subset of the power set of C, so defines a set and uses no selection. The kernel K of π meets C0 trivially, so KK. Every nonzero ideal of g meets h nontrivially: project a nonzero element onto its finitely many Cartan/root weight components by the same interpolation. A nonzero Cartan component already suffices; a root component spans its one-dimensional root space and brackets with the opposite root into a nonzero coroot by F2. Now π(K) is an ideal disjoint from h. To check disjointness, if π(z)=π(h) with zK and hC0, then zhKK, hence hKC0=0. Thus π(K)=0 and K=K.

step 1.1step 3.1F2algebra
5.1

The conjugate-linear assignment eifi, fiei, hihi preserves the relations of step 1.1 because all aij are real. For example [fi,ej]=δijhi, and [hi,fj]=aijfj. It therefore defines an involutive conjugate-linear Lie automorphism of C. It preserves C0 and permutes the ideals disjoint from it, so preserves K and descends by step 4.1 to an involution σ of g. It sends ei to fi, fi to ei, and each real coroot to its negative. Trace in any finite basis shows B(σx,σy)=B(x,y): conjugation by a conjugate-linear invertible map conjugates the entries and trace of the represented complex-linear operator. Hence x,y=B(x,σy) is a Hermitian form, linear in its first variable.

step 1.1step 4.1F1F2algebra
6.1

For hhR and xgα, applying σ to [h,x]=α(h)x gives [h,σx]=α(h)σx, since α(h) is real. Thus σgα=gα. F2's bilinear orthogonality makes the Cartan and individual root spaces pairwise orthogonal for  , . The Cartan restriction is positive definite because it is the complex Hermitian extension of the positive form BhR. Also ei,ei=B(ei,fi)=2/(αi,αi)>0. Invariance and σfi=ei give [ei,x],y=x,[fi,y]. Every positive nonsimple root space is obtained by raising a smaller positive root along a simple string, as F2 proves. If 0x is in that smaller space and raising is nonzero, F3 gives [fi,[ei,x]]=cx with real c>0. Therefore [ei,x],[ei,x]=cx,x. Induction on root height proves positivity on every positive root space. Moreover σx,σx=x,x, by symmetry of B and reality of a Hermitian diagonal value, so negative root spaces are positive too. Orthogonality now proves the form positive definite on all of g.

step 5.1F1F2F3algebra
7.1

Extend σ to a conjugate-linear graded algebra involution of S. It preserves R: for pR, adz(σp)=σ(adσzp)=0. Hence it preserves I degreewise. On Sd define p,qd=(1)d(p,σq)B. On products of d linear generators this equals the sum over bijections of products of the Hermitian pairings in step 6.1, by F1's explicit Fischer formula. A finite orthonormal basis of g exists by successive Gram–Schmidt subtraction and division by positive real square roots. Its degree-d monomials are orthogonal for this pairing, with strictly positive squared norms jaj!. Thus  , d is positive definite. Since σId=Id, its orthogonal complement of Id is precisely the bilinear annihilator Id=Hd from F1.

step 5.1step 6.1F1givenalgebra
8.1

In a finite-dimensional positive Hermitian space, choose a finite orthonormal basis u1,,uk of a subspace. The decomposition v=jv,ujuj+(vjv,ujuj) splits it from its perpendicular complement, and positivity makes their intersection zero. Apply this to Id in step 7.1. It gives exactly Sd=IdHd. Taking finite homogeneous sums gives the graded direct sum in the Statement. Both summands are g-stable by F1, so the unique projection onto either summand commutes with every adjoint operator; this proves equivariance without asserting that the positive form itself is invariant under complex g. In degree zero I0=0 and H0=C; for g=0 the same is the whole algebra. All actual basis and spectral choices were finite, and the free-word set and sums of ideals used explicit set constructions; no AC occurs.

step 7.1F1givenalgebra

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

9 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources