How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Universal vanishing locus for a map into a flat projective family
Statement
Assume AC and DC. Let be projective of finite presentation with Noetherian, coherent, and coherent and flat over . For a homomorphism there is a closed subscheme such that, for every , exactly when factors through . This condition concerns the entire homomorphism and includes nonreduced test schemes.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The hypotheses in the statement and AC and DC, inherited from the scheme, cohomology, and finite-module suppliers (The Axiom of Choice, The axiom of dependent choice: a relation in which every element is related to something admits an -indexed chain).
A flat finitely presented sheaf on a proper finitely presented scheme has a bounded nonnegative finite projective complex computing cohomology after every base change (Universal finite projective cohomology complex over any base). Coherent sheaves on a projective scheme over a Noetherian affine base admit presentations by finite sums of powers of a relatively very ample bundle (Eventual generation of coherent projective twists).
Proof
Work over an affine open of , and present by vector bundles that are sums of invertible twists. For , the sheaf is still base-flat. Let be its complex from [F1], and define . Since finite projectives commute with dual tensor comparison, naturally for every base algebra .
The presentation induces a natural transformation between these Hom functors, hence a map ; let be its cokernel. Left exactness of Hom, also after every pullback of the presentation, identifies with . Thus the Hom functor is the affine linear scheme . The map defines a section of this scheme, and the inverse image of its zero section is cut out by the image of associated to . This is a closed subscheme with the claimed property. The local constructions agree by that property and glue over .
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
58 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Nitin Nitsure, Construction of Hilbert and Quot Schemes, Sections 2–5 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Alexander Grothendieck, Les schémas de Hilbert, Bourbaki 221, Sections 2–3 (standard reference, not scraped)