How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Projectivity via a coherent projective bundle
Definition
On a locally Noetherian base , use coherent-projective-bundle projectivity for a global closed immersion with a coherent sheaf on . The sheaf need not be locally free or have a globally bounded number of generators. This is the projectivity convention in this Hilbert packet. H-projectivity from Projective morphisms before Proj is its special case with ; no implication from the former to the latter is asserted. Mere local projective embeddings without a global projective-bundle embedding do not define the hypothesis here. A chosen relatively ample polarization (Relative ampleness over an arbitrary base) need not equal the pullback of for the embedding; that pullback gives an auxiliary global relatively very ample bundle . No quasi-compactness assumption on is part of this definition.
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
15 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Nitsure, Construction of Hilbert and Quot Schemes, Section 5: Notions of Projectivity (standard reference, not scraped)