Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generatedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

A local IMEX Euler branch from contraction

Statement

Let d≥1, c∈Rd, R>0, h>0, and let b be defined on the closed Euclidean ball B‾(c,R). Suppose ∥b(z)∥2≤M and ∥b(z)−b(w)∥2≤L∥z−w∥2 there, with hM≤R and hL<1. Then the IMEX Euler equation Y=c+hb(Y) has exactly one solution in B‾(c,R). Every Y~ in that ball satisfies ∥Y~−Y∥2≤∥Y~−c−hb(Y~)∥21−hL. In the algorithm One-step IMEX Euler with an implicit branch and residual status, c=y+ha(y); this is a local branch result and gives no root outside the selected ball.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: d≥1, c,R,h,b,M,L and the bounds in the Statement.

[F1]

One-step IMEX Euler with an implicit branch and residual status: the implicit update is Y=c+hb(Y) and its unscaled update residual is Y~−c−hb(Y~).

[F5]

Lipschitz map, α-Hölder map for rational 0<α≤1, and contraction: a map is a contraction with constant q when its output distance is at most q times its input distance, where 0≤q<1.

[F6]

Proof

1.1givenF2F3F4construct

The ball is nonempty because it contains c. If (zn) is Cauchy in the ball, it is Cauchy in Rd, so [F2] gives a limit z∈Rd. By [F4], ∥z−c∥2≤∥z−zn∥2+∥zn−c∥2≤∥z−zn∥2+R; letting n→∞ gives ∥z−c∥2≤R, so z remains in the ball. Thus the ball is a nonempty complete metric space by [F3].

1.2givenF5algebra

Define T(z):=c+hb(z). For every z in the ball, ∥T(z)−c∥2=h∥b(z)∥2≤hM≤R, so T maps the ball into itself; for z,w in the ball, ∥T(z)−T(w)∥2≤hL∥z−w∥2, and hL<1 makes T a contraction as in [F5].

2.1step 1.1step 1.2F6

Applying [F6] to the complete ball and the contraction from step 1.2 gives a unique fixed point Y, which is exactly the unique solution of Y=c+hb(Y) in the ball.

3.1F1F4step 1.2step 2.1algebra∎

For any Y~ in the ball, [F4] and step 2.1 give ∥Y~−Y∥2≤∥Y~−T(Y~)∥2+∥T(Y~)−T(Y)∥2≤∥Y~−c−hb(Y~)∥2+hL∥Y~−Y∥2. Since 1−hL>0, rearranging proves the residual bound.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

56 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources