Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generatedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-07
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Tail comparisons under independent-copy symmetrization

Statement

Let X′ be an independent copy of a real random variable X. For every t>0, P(∣X−X′∣>t)≤2P(∣X∣>t/2). There exists a finite M≥0 with P(∣X∣≤M)≥1/2; for every such M, P(∣X−X′∣>t)≥12P(∣X∣>t+M).

Facts & Assumptions

[F1]

Independent-copy symmetrization of random series: Given an independent sequence (Xn)n≥1 on (Ω,F,P), form the product probability space (Ω2,F⊗F,P⊗P). Write Un(ω,ω′)=Xn(ω), Vn(ω,ω′)=Xn(ω′), and Zn=Un−Vn. Then (Un) and (Vn) are independent copies of the whole sequence, and the Zn are independent symmetric real random variables. Almost-sure convergence of ∑nXn implies almost-sure convergence of ∑nZn. If ∣Xn∣≤A almost surely for every n, with 0≤A<∞, then ∣Zn∣≤2A almost surely, EZn=0, and Var⁡(Zn)=2Var⁡(Xn).

[F2]

Continuity from below for measures: Let (En)n∈N be an increasing sequence of measurable sets for a measure μ, so En⊆En+1. Then μ(⋃n∈NEn)=sup⁡n∈Nμ(En). No finiteness hypothesis is required.

Proof

Given: The objects and hypotheses of the statement.

1.1F1givenalgebra

The triangle inequality gives {∣X−X′∣>t}⊆{∣X∣>t/2}∪{∣X′∣>t/2}. The union bound and equality of the two marginal laws give the upper estimate. Independent copies can be realized on the two-factor product described by symmetrization.

2.1F2step 1.1algebra∎

The intervals [−m,m] increase to R as positive integers m increase. Continuity from below gives P(∣X∣≤m)→1, so there is a suitable finite M. For any such M, the event {∣X∣>t+M, ∣X′∣≤M} implies ∣X−X′∣>t. Independence makes its probability P(∣X∣>t+M)P(∣X∣≤M), giving the lower bound. This includes M=0 when allowed by the law.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

14 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources