Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generatedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-07
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Tail comparisons under independent-copy symmetrization

Statement

Let X be an independent copy of a real random variable X. For every t>0, P(XX>t)2P(X>t/2). There exists a finite M0 with P(XM)1/2; for every such M, P(XX>t)12P(X>t+M).

Facts & Assumptions

[F1]

Independent-copy symmetrization of random series: Given an independent sequence (Xn)n1 on (Ω,F,P), form the product probability space (Ω2,FF,PP). Write Un(ω,ω)=Xn(ω), Vn(ω,ω)=Xn(ω), and Zn=UnVn. Then (Un) and (Vn) are independent copies of the whole sequence, and the Zn are independent symmetric real random variables. Almost-sure convergence of nXn implies almost-sure convergence of nZn. If XnA almost surely for every n, with 0A<, then Zn2A almost surely, EZn=0, and Var(Zn)=2Var(Xn).

[F2]

Continuity from below for measures: Let (En)nN be an increasing sequence of measurable sets for a measure μ, so EnEn+1. Then μ(nNEn)=supnNμ(En). No finiteness hypothesis is required.

Proof

Given: The objects and hypotheses of the statement.

1.1

The triangle inequality gives {XX>t}{X>t/2}{X>t/2}. The union bound and equality of the two marginal laws give the upper estimate. Independent copies can be realized on the two-factor product described by symmetrization.

F1givenalgebra
2.1

The intervals [m,m] increase to R as positive integers m increase. Continuity from below gives P(Xm)1, so there is a suitable finite M. For any such M, the event {X>t+M, XM} implies XX>t. Independence makes its probability P(X>t+M)P(XM), giving the lower bound. This includes M=0 when allowed by the law.

F2step 1.1algebra

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

14 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources