How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
FISTA energy recurrence with certified proximal errors
Statement
Let be the certified inexact FISTA iterates of Certified inexact proximal-gradient and FISTA updates, with errors , and let minimize . Set , , and . Then with the previous objective term interpreted as zero.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The inexact FISTA recurrence, certified errors and a minimizer in the Statement.
Certified inexact proximal-gradient and FISTA updates: , , satisfies the stated certificate, and hence , and for .
Proof
The recurrence [F1] gives for every , so is a convex combination. It also gives and , including with .
For , convexity gives . Apply [F2] at ; the same multiplication and norm expansion as in step 1.1 yield Use to obtain the stated recurrence. For , [F2] with gives the same base inequality directly, and leaves the previous objective term zero.
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
9 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.