How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The integral intersection pairing is unimodular for a simply connected four-manifold
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Choice. Let be a closed connected oriented smooth four-manifold with . Its integral intersection lattice on is a finite-rank free abelian group and its intersection pairing is unimodular.
Statement references
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Full AC and a closed connected oriented smooth four-manifold with trivial fundamental group.
The first Hurewicz map identifies with the abelianization of ; in particular it is zero here. The first Hurewicz map is abelianization
Poincaré duality for a closed oriented four-manifold gives an isomorphism , whose inverse sends a homology class to its cohomological dual. Poincaré duality for oriented topological manifolds
The universal-coefficient exact sequence for cohomology is . The universal coefficient theorem for cohomology over a PID
A closed smooth manifold has finite CW homotopy type under full AC, so its integral homology groups are finitely generated. A closed smooth manifold has the homotopy type of a finite CW complex
The definition of the integral intersection pairing is the Poincaré-duality cup-product pairing on modulo torsion. Integral intersection lattice of a simply connected four-manifold
Full AC is assumed; it supplies the CW homotopy-type result [F4] and the stated cohomological duality/UCT branch.
Proof
Given: The data and suppliers [F1]–[F5].
By [F1] and [A1], , so the Ext term in [F3] is zero and evaluation identifies with .
By [F4] and [A1], is finitely generated. Its quotient is therefore free of finite rank, and every homomorphism from to factors uniquely through . Thus .
Under the isomorphism [F2], the map sending to is the composite of the inverse Poincaré-duality map with the evaluation map of [F3]; [F5] identifies that composite with the intersection pairing. Both component maps are isomorphisms by steps 1.1–1.2 and [F2]. Hence the pairing map is an isomorphism.
Depends on
- Integral intersection lattice of a simply connected four-manifold
- Poincaré duality for oriented topological manifolds
- The universal coefficient theorem for cohomology over a PID
- The first Hurewicz map is abelianization
- A closed smooth manifold has the homotopy type of a finite CW complex
- The Axiom of Choice
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
42 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Simon K. Donaldson, An Application of Gauge Theory to the Topology of 4-Manifolds (standard reference, not scraped)