How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Derivative geometry error controls the Laplace tensor defect
Statement
Let be the orientation-preserving maps of Curved-domain geometry approximation errors, with and . Set and . Then , where depends only on . Consequently for .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Two orientation-preserving diffeomorphisms with the stated determinant lower bounds and uniform derivative upper bounds.
Curved-domain geometry approximation errors: and are the positive determinants.
Pullback gradients and induced surface metrics: the pulled-back Laplace tensor is .
Holder's inequality for integrals, including the endpoint cases: integral Cauchy–Schwarz bounds the product of the two gradient magnitudes.
Proof
On the bounded matrix set , the determinant is a polynomial in the entries, so its derivative is bounded on that set and . Apply this with and to obtain .
The inverse identity and show ; indeed every singular value is at most and their product is at least , so the smallest is at least and each inverse norm is at most . Expanding into the determinant difference and the two inverse-factor differences gives .
Pointwise, . Integrating and applying [F3] proves the stated bilinear-form defect bound; the right side is finite because both gradients are in .
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
17 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Jean-Luc Guermond, MATH 661 Fall 2023, Part III, Chapter 8 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Gerald Dziuk and Charles M. Elliott, Finite element methods for surface PDEs, Acta Numerica 22 (2013) (standard reference, not scraped)