Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Strang error bound for a parabolic isoparametric P1 family

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice and Countable Choice. Let Ω^=(−1,1)2, let Φ(x,y)=(x,y+x2/4), and let Φh be its continuous piecewise-affine nodal interpolant on a shape-regular matching triangular mesh with maximum diameter h≤1, small enough that Jh=det⁡DΦh≥1/2 as in P1 approximation of a parabolic shear map. Put J=det⁡DΦ and define the pulled-back Laplace tensors B=JDΦ−1DΦ−T,Bh=JhDΦh−1DΦh−T. On V=H01(Ω^) set a(v,w)=∫Ω^∇vTB∇w,ah(v,w)=∫Ω^∇vTBh∇w. Let Vh be the finite-dimensional space of continuous functions on Ω^‾ that are affine on each triangle and vanish on ∂Ω^, viewed as a subspace of V. Suppose a and ah are uniformly bounded and coercive on V and Vh, respectively, with constants independent of h, F∈V∗ and Fh∈Vh∗ are bounded, u∈H2(Ω^)∩V is real-valued and satisfies a(u,w)=F(w) for every w∈V, and uh∈Vh satisfies ah(uh,wh)=Fh(wh) for every wh∈Vh.

If a common physical boundary lift G∈C2 with bounded first and second derivatives on a convex neighborhood of the two geometry images is used, let ℓ∂,h be its pulled-back residual from Geometry error bounds a pulled-back boundary-lift residual and set ϵ∂,h=∥ℓ∂,h∥V∗. Assume the load difference on Vh splits as (F−Fh)∣Vh=Lbulk,h+ℓ∂,h∣Vh,∥Lbulk,h∥Vh∗≤ϵF,hbulk,ϵF,hbulk≥0. Here the V∗ and Vh∗ norms are induced by the H1 norm. If no lift is used, set ℓ∂,h=0 and take the same bound for the full load difference. Then ∥u−uh∥H1(Ω^)≤C(h∥u∥H2(Ω^)+ϵF,hbulk+ϵ∂,h). where C is independent of h. For the parabolic geometry family, ϵ∂,h≤CG(e0+e1)≤CGh.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The Axiom of Choice and Countable Choice; the parabolic exact and approximate geometry maps on the reference square; a shape-regular matching mesh with h≤1 and Jh≥1/2; bounded, uniformly coercive forms and bounded exact and discrete loads; the stated exact and discrete variational solutions; and, when a lift is present, the stated decomposition of the load difference.

[L1]

Hk=Wk,2 with the derivative-sum Sobolev norm, and H01=W01,2 is the norm closure of Cc∞ in H1. (The notation Hk and the reserved zero-boundary symbol, Integer-order Sobolev spaces and their norms, Zero-boundary Sobolev space as a norm closure)

[L2]

A matching affine mesh is a finite face-to-face triangulation by nondegenerate cells; shape regularity gives the cellwise scaling hypotheses used by the P1 interpolation estimate. (Matching affine simplicial meshes and shape regularity, Shape regularity controls affine simplex geometry)

[L3]

e0 and e1 denote the uniform value and derivative geometry gaps. (Curved-domain geometry approximation errors)

[F1]

For the parabolic geometry family, e0≤Ch2, e1≤Ch, and Jh≥1/2 for sufficiently small h. (P1 approximation of a parabolic shear map)

[F2]

The pullback of the physical Laplace form has tensor JDΦ−1DΦ−T, and the tensor difference obeys ∥B−Bh∥L∞≤Ce1. (Pullback gradients and induced surface metrics, Derivative geometry error controls the Laplace tensor defect)

[F3]

On each affine triangle, the identity-map P1 interpolant of an H2 function has H1 error at most ChK∥u∥H2(K); the constants are uniform over the shape-regular mesh family. (P1 interpolation scaling on uniformly curved cells)

[F4]

The nodal P1 interpolant of u∈H2∩H01 is well-defined, continuous across the mesh, zero on boundary edges, and belongs to Vh. (The nodal P1 interpolant preserves homogeneous boundary values)

[F5]

The first Strang estimate bounds the error by best approximation, the form defect, and the load defect divided by the uniform discrete coercivity constant. (First Strang estimate for conforming perturbed Galerkin problems)

[F6]

The variational-crime framework defines δa,h(vh)=sup⁡wh≠0∣a(vh,wh)−ah(vh,wh)∣/∥wh∥H1 and δF,h=sup⁡wh≠0∣F(wh)−Fh(wh)∣/∥wh∥H1. (Variational-crime settings and consistency defects)

[F7]

For the common C2 physical lift, the pulled-back residual satisfies ∥ℓ∂,h∥V∗≤CG(e0+e1). (Geometry error bounds a pulled-back boundary-lift residual)

[F8]

With the standard H1 inner product, H01(Ω^) is a closed Hilbert subspace of H1(Ω^). (The Sobolev space H1 is a Hilbert space)

[A1]

Countable Choice is assumed through the first-Strang, geometry and interpolation interfaces. (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω))

[A2]

The Axiom of Choice is assumed for the automatic nodal-boundedness clause of the interpolation supplier and the local conformity result. (The Axiom of Choice)

Proof

1.1A1F1F5F8L1given

The exact shear has positive determinant, and [F1] gives Jh≥1/2; thus both tensor formulas are defined almost everywhere. By [L1] and [F8], V=H01(Ω^) is Hilbert in the stated H1 norm. The boundedness and coercivity assumptions, bounded loads, finite-dimensional conforming subspace Vh⊂V, and the given variational equations supply the remaining hypotheses of [F5].

1.2A1F1F2F6F7L3givenalgebra

For vh,wh∈Vh, [F2] and integral Cauchy--Schwarz give ∣a(vh,wh)−ah(vh,wh)∣≤Ce1∥vh∥H1∥wh∥H1. Taking the supremum in [F6] yields δa,h(vh)≤Ch∥vh∥H1 by [F1]. The assumed load decomposition and the triangle inequality give δF,h≤ϵF,hbulk+ϵ∂,h, because restriction of the V∗ residual norm to Vh⊂V cannot increase it.

1.3F3F4A1A2L1L2givenalgebra

By [L2], the shape-regular matching mesh satisfies the affine scaling hypotheses in [F3]. Apply [F3] on each triangle with the identity geometry map. The finite element interpolants assemble into the global nodal interpolant Ihu, and [F4] gives Ihu∈Vh. Squaring each local estimate, summing over cells, and using hK≤h gives ∥u−Ihu∥H1≤Ch∥u∥H2. Since h≤1, [L1] gives ∥Ihu∥H1≤∥u∥H1+Ch∥u∥H2≤C∥u∥H2.

2.1A1F5step 1.2step 1.3algebra

Use Ihu as the comparison function in [F5]. Step 1.3 bounds the best-approximation term by Ch∥u∥H2; steps 1.2 and 1.3 bound its form defect by Ch∥Ihu∥H1≤Ch∥u∥H2; and step 1.2 bounds the load defect by the two stated load tolerances. Uniform positive discrete coercivity in [F5] proves the displayed Strang estimate.

3.1A1F1F7L3step 2.1algebra∎

By [F1] and [F7], ϵ∂,h≤CG(e0+e1)≤CG(h2+h)≤CG′h for h≤1. The residual remains an explicit term of the error bound, including when its O(h) rate dominates higher-order geometric terms.

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

66 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources