How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
First Strang estimate for conforming perturbed Galerkin problems
Statement
Assume Countable Choice. Let be a real or complex Hilbert space, a bounded coercive form with boundedness constant and coercivity constant , and a bounded functional linear in the real case and conjugate-linear in the complex test argument. Let be finite-dimensional, and let and be bounded, with having the same test-linearity as , and coercive with constant in the inherited norm. Both and are sesquilinear (bilinear over ), linear in their first argument and conjugate-linear in their second over . There are unique exact and discrete solutions and , and
where the defects are those of Variational-crime settings and consistency defects. For a family of meshes this is a uniform estimate whenever and the displayed approximation and defect terms are uniformly controlled. The term retains source approximation and data oscillation.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Countable Choice; with the Hilbert, boundedness, coercivity, and finite-dimensional hypotheses of the Statement.
Bounded, coercive and symmetric sesquilinear forms: and ; the real bilinear case does not require symmetry.
The Lax--Milgram theorem under The Axiom of Countable Choice (): a bounded coercive form on a Hilbert space with a bounded functional has a unique solution to its variational equation.
A finite-dimensional normed subspace is closed: a finite-dimensional subspace of a normed space is closed; therefore with the inherited inner product is a Hilbert space.
Variational-crime settings and consistency defects: and are the indicated suprema of the form and load defects against nonzero tests in .
is sesquilinear (bilinear over ), with the stated first- and second-argument conventions; it is bounded and on ; is bounded.
Proof
The hypotheses on are exactly those of [F2], so [F2] gives a unique satisfying for every .
By [F3], is closed in , hence complete in its inherited Hilbert norm. The restriction of is bounded and coercive by [A1], and is bounded; applying [F2] on gives a unique with for every .
Fix any and put . Discrete coercivity and the discrete equation give .
Since , the exact equation gives , and . The boundedness of [F1] and the defect definitions [F4] therefore imply .
If the comparison is immediate; otherwise divide step 3.1 by and use . This proves the displayed bound for each , and taking the infimum proves the theorem.
Depends on
Used by
- A midpoint-quadrature P1 solve has an explicit Strang error budget Corollary
- Shape-regular affine finite elements supply the Strang approximation term Corollary
- One midpoint sample destroys a quadratic stiffness coercivity bound Example
- State and adjoint Strang bounds give a reduced-gradient error certificate Lemma
- Conditional O(h2) variational control error under H2 regularity and full uniform L2 estimates Theorem
- Conforming elliptic finite-element reduced gradients have an energy-norm error budget Theorem
- GLL spectral-element energy error retains the quadrature defect Theorem
- Isogeometric geometry and quadrature defects enter through Strang's bound Theorem
- Piecewise-constant control with shape-regular finite elements has O(h) error Theorem
- Strang error bound for a parabolic isoparametric P1 family Theorem
Dependency tree · two levels
38 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Jean-Luc Guermond, MATH 661 Fall 2025, Part VI, Chapter 27, Error analysis with variational crimes (standard reference, not scraped)
- Joachim Schöberl, Numerical Methods for Partial Differential Equations, Chapter 25, Non-conforming Finite Element Methods (standard reference, not scraped)