Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck pass
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Geometry error bounds a pulled-back boundary-lift residual

Statement

Assume Countable Choice. Let Ω^=(−1,1)2 carry a finite matching affine triangular mesh T as in Matching affine simplicial meshes and shape regularity. Let Φ,Φh:Ω^‾→R2 be continuous and C1 on each closed triangle, with matching traces on shared edges, and suppose ∥DΦ∥∞+∥DΦh∥∞≤M, e0=∥Φ−Φh∥∞, and e1=∥DΦ−DΦh∥L∞;op. Let G be a scalar physical boundary lift on an open convex neighborhood containing both images and every segment joining corresponding image points, with ∥DG∥∞≤L1 and ∥D2G∥∞≤L2. Define the piecewise pullback gradients by ∇pw(G∘Φ)=DΦT∇G(Φ) and ∇pw(G∘Φh)=DΦhT∇G(Φh), and set ℓ∂,h(w)=∫Ω^(∇pw(G∘Φ)−∇pw(G∘Φh))⋅∇w,w∈H01(Ω^). With the H1 dual norm, ∥ℓ∂,h∥(H01)∗≤2(L1e1+ML2e0). Thus the geometry-induced boundary-lift contribution to the Strang load defect is O(e0+e1).

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Countable Choice; the reference square; continuous, cellwise C1 maps with the stated derivative gap and upper bound; a C2 lift G on a convex neighborhood of both images; and w∈H01(Ω^).

[F1]

Curved-domain geometry approximation errors: e0 and e1 are the uniform value and derivative gaps between exact and approximate geometry maps.

[F2]

The chain rule for total derivatives: D(g∘f)(a)=Dg(f(a))∘Df(a): D(G∘Φ)=DΦT(DG∘Φ) wherever the cell maps are differentiable.

[F3]

Holder's inequality for integrals, including the endpoint cases: ∣∫f⋅g∣≤∥f∥L2∥g∥L2.

[F4]

Under Countable Choice, the Lebesgue measurable sets form a sigma-algebra containing every elementary set, and Lebesgue measure agrees there with elementary volume. For the half-open box B=(−1,1]2, its elementary volume is 4. (Assuming countable choice, L(Rn) is a sigma-algebra containing every elementary set and λn is a complete measure extending elementary volume, The sum of the volumes of a disjoint box decomposition of an elementary set does not depend on the decomposition, Half-open boxes in Rn and their volume, Elementary sets: the finite unions of half-open boxes in Rn)

[F5]

A measure is nonnegative and finitely additive on disjoint measurable sets; consequently it is monotone on measurable sets, since E⊆B gives B=E∪(B∖E). (Measures on sigma-algebras)

[F6]

Under Countable Choice, on each affine triangle, the Gauss--Green formula applies to a C1 vector field on its closure, and the induced orientations on the two copies of a shared edge are opposite in a matching mesh. (Gauss–Green formula on an affine simplex, Interior facet orientations cancel in a matching mesh)

[A1]

Countable Choice is used through [F4] and the Gauss--Green supplier in [F6] (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)).

Proof

1.1F1F2F6givenalgebra

Because each geometry map and its traces are continuous across every interior edge, G∘Φ and G∘Φh have matching traces there. Apply [F6] on each triangle to the product of the pulled-back lift with a compactly supported smooth test function; the interior-edge fluxes cancel, and the outer boundary term vanishes. Thus the displayed piecewise gradients are the weak gradients of the pulled-back lifts. On each triangle, [F2] and the triangle inequality give ∣∇pw(G∘Φ)−∇pw(G∘Φh)∣≤L1e1+ML2e0, using the bound on D2G along the joining segment.

2.1F4F5A1step 1.1givenalgebra

For n≥2 put Bn=(−1+1/n,1−1/n]2. Each Bn is an elementary half-open box in the convention (a,b], and (−1,1)2=⋃n≥2Bn: one inclusion is immediate, and for any x∈(−1,1)2 choose n with 1/n<min⁡i{1+xi,1−xi} for both coordinates. Thus [F4] makes Ω^ measurable. Since Ω^⊂B=(−1,1]2, [F5] and [F4] give ∣Ω^∣≤λ2(B)=4. Step 1.1 therefore yields ∥∇pw(G∘Φ)−∇pw(G∘Φh)∥L2(Ω^)≤2(L1e1+ML2e0).

3.1F1F3step 2.1algebra∎

Apply [F3] to the defining integral for ℓ∂,h(w) and use ∥∇w∥L2≤∥w∥H1. Taking the supremum over unit H01 tests proves the dual bound.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

56 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources