How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Conditional type-class cardinality bound
Statement
Let be finite nonempty alphabets, let , and let be an attainable joint -type on . For with , put ; this is an -type. If has empirical type , then where is the type class of length and is the finite conditional entropy for joint law .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The finite alphabets, blocklength, joint type, and fixed sequence in the Statement.
Empirical types, n-types, and type classes: an empirical type records each symbol count divided by blocklength, and its type class is the set of words with that type.
Marginals and positive-mass conditionals of a finite joint law are probability vectors: each conditional vector of a joint probability vector given a positive-mass value is a probability vector.
Polynomially sharp bounds for type-class cardinality: for any finite alphabet and attainable type , , where is that type's blocklength.
Finite conditional entropy: , omitting zero-mass conditioning values.
Proof
For each with , let . The sets partition the positions of . A word has joint type with this fixed exactly when, within each , it places copies of symbol . These counts sum to , and their ratios define the attainable type of length . Restriction to each gives a bijection from the joint-type fiber to the Cartesian product of these local type classes, so their cardinalities multiply and give the displayed product. Values with have no positions and contribute factor .
Apply [F3] to each factor in step 1.1, with blocklength , to get . Multiplying the finite bounds gives , which equals by [F4] and [F5]. The omitted zero-mass rows contribute zero to the entropy sum.
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
13 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Yury Polyanskiy and Yihong Wu, Information Theory: From Coding to Learning, author-hosted book draft (standard reference, not scraped)
- Thomas M. Cover and Joy A. Thomas, Elements of Information Theory, second edition, Chapter 11 (standard reference, not scraped)