How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Conditional type packing bounds for source-indexed DM-MAC codebooks
Statement
Let have the finite law Fix a deterministic and a transmitted tuple such that is support-restricted strongly typical for this law within tolerance . For every source sequence , independently generate a user- codeword with law ; all entries and both users' codebooks are independent. A decoder tests joint typicality at tolerance .
There is a finite constant and a function such that the conditional expected numbers of wrong typical candidates differing in source 1 only, source 2 only, and both sources, respectively, satisfy The expectations are over the unexposed wrong source-indexed codebook entries. The constants depend only on the target law and alphabets, not on the particular typical transmitted tuple.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The stated finite law, source-indexed conditional codebooks, a typical transmitted tuple, and a finite DM-MAC.
Finite strongly typical sets with support restriction: support-restricted strong typicality bounds every positive empirical atom relative to its target probability and excludes zero-probability atoms.
Finite type-class cardinality bounds: an empirical type class on an alphabet of size has at most elements, and at most types occur.
Finite conditional entropy: conditional entropy is a finite weighted sum over positive-mass conditioning atoms.
Finite entropy and mutual-information chain rules: finite conditional entropy obeys the chain rule.
Finite conditional mutual information identities and equality: finite conditional mutual information is nonnegative and equals the corresponding conditional entropy difference.
Two-user discrete memoryless multiple-access channel: given the two inputs, the channel output law is .
Finite mutual information: finite mutual information is defined by the joint-to-product KL sum in nats.
Finite conditional mutual information: finite conditional mutual information averages the conditional mutual information over positive-mass conditioning values.
Proof
For a fixed conditioning block, group candidate tuples by their joint empirical type with that block. If the wrong set is , the varying letters are and the fixed block is ; for interchange indices. The number of joint types is at most by [F2]. For any one type, splitting its positions according to the fixed conditioning letters gives a product of conditional type classes, each of size at most the exponential of its empirical conditional entropy by [F2]. Thus the candidate count is at most .
For each such candidate, its codeword probability is the product of the conditional kernels . On a support-restricted -typical type, its negative log probability divided by differs from by at most : write the logarithm as the finite sum of empirical frequencies times ; the summands are bounded on the finite positive support, and [F1] controls every frequency. Also differs from the target conditional entropy by at most , because finite-alphabet entropy is continuous, including at zero via . Multiplying the count from step 1.1 by the largest candidate probability gives exponent at most
For , expand the conditional entropy in step 2.1 by [F4]. Since is conditionally independent of given , and is conditionally independent of given , the factorization in the Given law gives The channel factorization [F6] implies , so the last mutual information is . Combining with step 2.1 proves the bound. Exchanging indices proves the bound.
For , the same conditional entropy expansion gives because is independent of the source pair, the two codebook kernels factor given , and the channel depends on the source only through . Substitution in step 2.1 proves the bound.
Depends on
- Finite strongly typical sets with support restriction
- Finite type-class cardinality bounds
- Finite conditional entropy
- Finite mutual information
- Finite conditional mutual information
- Finite entropy and mutual-information chain rules
- Finite conditional mutual information identities and equality
- Two-user discrete memoryless multiple-access channel
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
16 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Abbas El Gamal and Young-Han Kim, Network Information Theory, Lecture Notes 15, transmission of correlated sources over a DM-MAC (standard reference, not scraped)
- Abbas El Gamal and Thomas M. Cover, Multiple User Information Theory, Proceedings of the IEEE 68 (1980), §VII (standard reference, not scraped)