How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Attainment of finite-alphabet rate-distortion minima
Statement
Let be nonempty finite sets, let be a probability mass function on , and let be finite-valued. Put
For every , the feasible stochastic channels satisfying form a nonempty set exactly when . Whenever nonempty, mutual information in bits attains its minimum over this set.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Nonempty finite alphabets , a source pmf , and finite nonnegative distortion .
Finite mutual information: for a finite joint pmf, mutual information in nats is its finite joint-law KL sum.
Finite information quantities convert by the logarithm base: mutual information in bits is the finite nats value divided by .
Heine-Borel in : with the Euclidean metric a subset of is compact if and only if it is closed and bounded, and the proof by bisection uses no choice principle; the same holds on the real line: closed bounded subsets of finite-dimensional Euclidean space are compact.
A continuous real-valued function on a nonempty compact metric space is bounded and attains a greatest and a least value: a continuous real-valued function on a nonempty compact metric space attains a minimum.
Proof
For each , choose a minimizing from the nonempty finite set ; finite choice is available by successive selection from finitely many nonempty sets. The deterministic channel has expected distortion . Conversely, each channel row is a probability vector, so its conditional mean distortion is at least ; averaging against shows every channel has distortion at least . Thus feasibility is equivalent to .
For a probability vector , set , with . The scalar function on extends continuously to zero because ; hence entropy is continuous on every finite simplex. Expanding the finite KL sum in [F1] gives , where ; all terms are continuous functions of the channel coordinates.
Identify all channels with a point in . The row-sum equalities, nonnegativity inequalities and expected-distortion inequality define a closed set; the cube makes it bounded. When feasible it is nonempty, so [F3] makes it compact.
By [F2], division by the positive constant preserves continuity. Thus the bit mutual-information objective is continuous on the nonempty compact feasible set in step 2.1; [F4] gives a point where it attains its minimum. This proves attainment.
Depends on
- Finite mutual information
- Heine-Borel in $\mathbb{R}^n$: with the Euclidean metric a subset of $\mathbb{R}^n$ is compact if and only if it is closed and bounded, and the proof by bisection uses no choice principle; the same holds on the real line
- Finite information quantities convert by the logarithm base
- A continuous real-valued function on a nonempty compact metric space is bounded and attains a greatest and a least value
Used by
- Finite-alphabet information rate-distortion function Definition
- Stationary finite-block information rate-distortion function Definition
- Convexity, monotonicity, and continuity of finite rate-distortion Lemma
- Finite-IID rate-distortion mutual-information converse Lemma
- Stationary block rate-distortion limit and endpoint continuity Lemma
- Finite-alphabet memoryless rate-distortion coding theorem Theorem
- Lossy separation for finite IID sources and finite DMCs Theorem
Dependency tree · two levels
49 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Robert M. Gray, Source Coding Theory, first edition (standard reference, not scraped)
- Thomas M. Cover and Joy A. Thomas, Elements of Information Theory, 2nd ed. (standard reference, not scraped)