Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-generatedPipeline-generatedprecheck pending
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Stationary block rate-distortion limit and endpoint continuity

Statement

For a stationary finite-alphabet source and bounded additive distortion as in Stationary finite-block information rate-distortion function, the sequence Rn(D) has a limit for every feasible D, and

lim⁡n→∞Rn(D)=inf⁡n≥1Rn(D)=Rblock(D).

The function Rblock is nonincreasing and convex on [Dmin⁡,∞), is zero for D≥Dc, and is right-continuous at Dmin⁡. It is infinite for 0≤D<Dmin⁡.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A stationary process on a finite nonempty source alphabet, a finite nonempty reproduction alphabet, and bounded finite nonnegative distortion.

[F1]

Stationary finite-block information rate-distortion function: nRn(D) is the minimum block mutual information in bits subject to normalized additive distortion; Dmin⁡ is the pointwise minimum mean distortion and Dc is the best constant-reproduction distortion.

[F2]

Finite mutual information and Finite information quantities convert by the logarithm base: finite mutual information is a finite KL sum and bits equal nats divided by ln⁡2.

[F4]

Finite log-sum inequality with support and equality cases: finite log-sum gives convexity of mutual information in a channel for fixed input law.

[F5]

Attainment of finite-alphabet rate-distortion minima: every feasible finite block channel minimum is attained.

[F6]

Data processing for a finite Markov chain, with equality condition: finite information cannot increase under deterministic postprocessing.

Proof

1.1F1F5givenconstruct

Write an(D)=nRn(D), and choose minimizing channels for blocks of lengths m and n, available by [F5]. Use their conditional product as a channel on the concatenated block. Stationarity gives the same marginal laws for the second block as for a block of length n; each part has mean distortion at most D, so the concatenated normalized distortion is at most D.

1.2F1F2F4givenalgebra

A best constant reconstruction has normalized expected distortion Dc and zero mutual information for every block. Applying the finite log-sum inequality [F4] to the joint pmf and the product of its marginals, both of total mass one, gives nonnegative mutual information; hence Rn(D)=0 for D≥Dc. If D<Dmin⁡, every coordinate distortion is at least its pointwise minimum, so no block channel is feasible and each Rn(D)=+∞.

1.3F1F5givenalgebra

Suppose Dc>Dmin⁡, and let γ be the smallest positive value among the finite gaps d(x,x^)−min⁡zd(x,z); thus γ>0. Fix 0<ϵ<γ/2. Since Dmin⁡+ϵ is feasible, [F5] supplies a minimizing length-n channel at that distortion budget. Let Si=1 when its chosen reproduction has positive gap from the pointwise minimum, and let α=n−1∑iP(Si=1). The excess above the block minimum is at least γ∑iSi/n, so α≤ϵ/γ.

2.1F2F3step 1.1algebra

Let (X1,Y1) and (X2,Y2) denote the two source/output block pairs under that channel. Conditional independence of the two channel outputs given the full source block gives H(Y1,Y2∣X1,X2)=H(Y1∣X1)+H(Y2∣X2). Entropy subadditivity gives H(Y1,Y2)≤H(Y1)+H(Y2). Subtracting these finite quantities and using [F3] yields I(X1,X2;Y1,Y2)≤I(X1;Y1)+I(X2;Y2), so am+n(D)≤am(D)+an(D). The source blocks need not be independent.

2.2F1F3F6step 1.3algebraconstruct

Fix a pointwise minimizer x^∗(x) for each source letter and a dummy symbol x^d∈X^. Keep the original output where Si=0 and replace it by x^∗(Xi) where Si=1, obtaining X^′n; then d(Xi,X^i′)=min⁡x^d(Xi,x^) for every i, so stationarity gives Edn(Xn,X^′n)=Dmin⁡. Let Ci=x^∗(Xi) when Si=1 and x^d otherwise. Since X^′n is a function of (X^n,Sn,Cn), data processing and the entropy chain rule give I(Xn;X^′n)≤I(Xn;X^n,Sn,Cn)≤I(Xn;X^n)+H(Sn)+H(Cn∣Sn). Each Ci is fixed when Si=0 and has at most ∣X^∣ values when Si=1, so H(Cn∣Sn)≤∑iP(Si=1)log⁡2∣X^∣. Entropy subadditivity and concavity of binary entropy give H(Sn)≤nh2(α). Thus Rn(Dmin⁡)≤Rn(Dmin⁡+ϵ)+h2(ϵ/γ)+(ϵ/γ)log⁡2∣X^∣, since h2 is increasing on [0,1/2].

3.1step 2.1algebra

Fix k≥1, write n=qk+r with 0≤r<k, and put a0=0. Repeated subadditivity gives an≤qak+ar. The finite set {ar:0≤r<k} is bounded, so lim sup⁡nan/n≤ak/k. Taking the infimum over k, while inf⁡kak/k≤lim inf⁡nan/n, proves an/n→inf⁡kak/k.

4.1F1F4step 3.1

For each fixed n, the feasible block-channel sets are nested as D increases, so Rn(D) is nonincreasing. Mixing two block channels and applying [F4] shows Rn is convex. Passing to the pointwise limit from step 3.1 preserves both monotonicity and the convexity inequality.

5.1step 4.1step 1.2step 2.2algebra∎

Taking infima over n in step 2.2 gives the same inequality for Rblock. The two error terms tend to zero as ϵ↓0; monotonicity from step 4.1 gives the reverse bound Rblock(Dmin⁡+ϵ)≤Rblock(Dmin⁡), proving right-continuity. If Dc=Dmin⁡, step 1.2 already gives zero on the entire feasible interval.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

31 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources