Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generatedPipeline-generatedprecheck pass
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Random-cut stationary ergodic block-channel approximation

Statement

Assume AC. Let (Xt)t∈Z be a stationary ergodic source on a finite alphabet X, let X^ be finite nonempty, and let d:X×X^→[0,dmax⁡] be bounded. For any feasible D≥Dmin⁡ and any r>Rblock(D), there is a jointly stationary ergodic pair (Xt,X^t)t∈Z with the given source marginal, Ed(X0,X^0)≤D, and

lim sup⁡n→∞1nI2(X0n−1;X^0n−1)<rbits per symbol,

where I2:=Inat/ln⁡2 for the measure-theoretic mutual information of Measure-theoretic mutual information.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: AC; a two-sided stationary ergodic finite-alphabet source; bounded finite distortion; feasible D; and r>Rblock(D).

[A1]

The Axiom of Choice: the product and conditional-law suppliers below assume AC.

[F1]

Finite-alphabet stationary source: source stationarity and ergodicity refer to the two-sided left shift.

[F2]

Stationary finite-block information rate-distortion function: Rk(D) is the minimum length-k mutual information per symbol at expected block distortion at most D, and Rblock(D)=inf⁡kRk(D).

[F3]

Stationary block rate-distortion limit and endpoint continuity: the finite block minima are attained whenever feasible and their normalized limit equals Rblock(D).

[F4]

By Assuming countable choice, L(Rn) is a sigma-algebra containing every elementary set and λn is a complete measure extending elementary volume, countable choice makes Lebesgue measure countably additive, so its restriction to Borel subsets of [0,1] is a measure. The unit-uniform law on [0,1] is this restricted measure; [A1] gives countable choice and A box in Rn with parameters ai≤bi is Lebesgue measurable of measure ∏i<n(bi−ai), whichever of its faces are included gives λ([0,1])=1, so Probability measures and probability spaces makes it a probability. The unit interval with its Borel structure is standard Borel, A countable discrete measurable space is standard Borel, and Finite products of standard Borel spaces are standard Borel make {0,1}×[0,1] a standard-Borel coordinate space. AC supplies countable choice by The Axiom of Choice implies countable choice, so Under the Axiom of Countable Choice, countable products and Gδ subspaces of Polish spaces are Polish makes its countable product Polish; Assuming countable choice, a countable product of second countable spaces is second countable gives a countable cylinder basis, showing its Borel sigma-algebra equals the product sigma-algebra. Finite product laws exist by For sigma-finite factors, the product measure exists, has the rectangle formula, is sigma-finite, and is unique, and Assuming the Axiom of Choice, Kolmogorov extension for arbitrary families of standard Borel coordinate spaces extends their consistent independent marginals to the two-sided marker-seed process.

[F5]

Measure-theoretic mutual information, Mutual-information chain rule without subtracting infinities, and Conditional mutual information by a same-marginal product law: standard-Borel mutual information is the joint-law KL in nats, obeys the extended chain rule, and conditional information is nonnegative. In this proof write I2:=Inat/ln⁡2 and scale conditional information by the same positive factor, so all information bounds are in bits. A measurable coordinate swap preserves the joint law and its product reference, and, with a conditioning coordinate fixed, its same-marginal conditional-product reference. Hence mutual information and conditional mutual information are symmetric in their two unconditioned variables; the same holds after the common conversion to bits. KL is invariant under a measurable bijection

[F6]

Data processing for a finite Markov chain, with equality condition: for finite variables, adding or discarding a stochastic postprocessing cannot increase mutual information.

[F7]

Birkhoff pointwise ergodic theorem: time averages of an integrable function converge almost surely to a finite invariant function. In the bounded ergodic case used here, step 1.3 identifies that limit with the mean.

[F8]

The countable product marker space {0,1}Z with its product sigma-algebra is standard Borel by the countable-product Polish and countable-cylinder-basis argument in [F4], using the product-topology, product-sigma-algebra and standard-Borel conventions The product set ∏i∈IXi of functions choosing a point in each factor, the projections, the box topology, and the product topology as the initial topology of the projections; the empty product is a one-point space, The product sigma-algebra and its finite iterates, The Borel sigma-algebra of a topological space, and Standard Borel spaces.

Proof

Given: The hypotheses and suppliers [A1], [F1]–[F7].

1.1F2F3givenchoose

By [F2]–[F3], choose k≥1 and a length-k test channel Wk whose expected normalized distortion is at most D. Write Ik:=I2(X0k−1;X^0k−1) bits for this channel and rk:=Ik/k. The choice can be made with rk<r because Rblock(D)=inf⁡kRk(D)<r and the finite-block minimum is attained.

1.2A1F4F5givenconstruct

Fix p∈(0,1). By [F4], the consistent finite-dimensional product laws of a mutually independent family (Bt,Ut)t∈Z, with each Bt∼Bernoulli(p) and each Ut uniform on [0,1], extend to a probability law PM on ΩM=({0,1}×[0,1])Z with its product sigma-algebra; the marker and seed processes are independent. Let (ΩX,PX,T) be the source shift system and form the independent product extension (ΩX×ΩM,PX⊗PM,T×S), where S is the marker-seed shift. The product measure exists by [F4], and its rectangle formula makes the source independent of both marker and seed processes. Almost surely there are marker times Bt=1 arbitrarily far in both directions: for each fixed starting index, the probability of no marker in the next N sites is (1−p)N→0, and a countable union handles all starting indices. Thus the marker set partitions Z into finite segments between consecutive markers.

1.3F1F4F7givenalgebra

The product of the source system and the iid marker-seed shift is ergodic. To verify this, take two bounded real-valued rectangle cylinder functions f1(X)g1(B,U) and f2(X)g2(B,U). For all sufficiently large shifts n, the iid-coordinate windows of g1 and g2∘Sn are disjoint, so their expectation factors as Eg1 Eg2. For the source factor, [F7] gives almost-sure convergence of N−1∑n=0N−1f2(TnX) to a finite invariant function f2∗. Ergodicity makes f2∗ constant almost surely: for each rational a, the limsup orbit set lim sup⁡n→∞T−n{f2∗>a} is strictly invariant and differs from {f2∗>a} by a null set, so it has probability zero or one; the rational level sets then force a constant value. Since f2 is bounded, dominated convergence and preservation of the source law show this constant is Ef2. Thus the time averages of f2 converge almost surely to Ef2, and bounded convergence gives 1N∑n=0N−1E[f1(X)f2(TnX)]⟶Ef1 Ef2. The Cesàro correlations of the rectangle functions therefore converge to the product of their means. Their finite linear combinations are dense in real product L2: indicators of measurable rectangles form a generating π-system, and the class of sets whose indicators lie in the L2-closure of their span is a Dynkin class, since increasing unions converge in L2 on a probability space. The π-λ theorem and density of simple functions give the claim. Cauchy–Schwarz and shift invariance extend the correlation limit to every real L2 function. If A is invariant, its indicator has correlation P(A) at every shift, while the limit is P(A)2; hence P(A)∈{0,1}.

2.1F1step 1.2givenconstruct

Fix a pointwise minimizer x^∗(x) for each source letter. For a segment beginning at marker s and ending just before the next marker s+L, divide its first k⌊L/k⌋ sites into consecutive length-k blocks. At each such block start use its seed Ut and the finite inverse-cumulative rule to sample an output block from Wk(⋅∣Xtt+k−1); on the remaining L mod k<k sites, output x^∗(Xt). On the shift-invariant null set where markers do not occur arbitrarily far in both directions, define X^t=x^∗(Xt) for every t. The resulting map is measurable because each good-segment event is determined by finitely many marker coordinates and each seed selects among finitely many outputs by measurable intervals; it is shift-equivariant because all rules translate with the markers.

3.1F1step 2.1step 1.3

The pair (X,X^) is a shift-commuting factor of the ergodic product system from step 1.3, so it is stationary and ergodic: the preimage of a shift-invariant event in the factor is shift-invariant in the product and therefore has probability zero or one. Its source marginal is unchanged because the construction leaves X fixed.

3.2step 1.2step 2.1algebra

Let α be the probability that coordinate zero lies in a leftover suffix. A segment of length ℓ has ℓ mod k leftover sites. Summing over its possible start and length gives α=p2∑ℓ=1∞(ℓ mod k)(1−p)ℓ−1≤(k−1)p2∑ℓ=1∞(1−p)ℓ−1=(k−1)p. Marker events in this sum specify a cut at the segment start, no intervening marker, and a cut at the end; the leftover site is one of the final ℓ mod k positions.

4.1F1F2step 2.1step 3.2givenalgebra

The marker process is independent of X. For any length-n window, condition on the markers and sum distortion over all test-channel blocks fully contained in the window; each such block has the stationary length-k source law, so its expected total distortion is at most kD. At most two blocks intersect the window without being contained, and their total distortion is bounded by 2kdmax⁡. Leftover sites have expected distortion Dmin⁡ each. Divide by n, take expectations, and let n→∞; the boundary contribution vanishes, while stationarity makes the expected mean distortion equal to Ed(X0,X^0) for every n. Since the expected leftover fraction is α, this yields Ed(X0,X^0)≤(1−α)D+αDmin⁡≤D.

4.2A1F1F4F5F6F8step 1.2step 2.1step 3.2givenalgebra

Let E be the independent marker process B, leaving the independent uniform seeds unconditioned. Its value space {0,1}Z is standard Borel by [F4] and [F8]. Put U=X0n−1 and V=X^0n−1. Independence in step 1.2 gives PUE=PU⊗PE, so I2(U;E)=D(PU⊗PE∥PU⊗PE)/ln⁡2=0. Coordinate-swap invariance and the first-argument chain rule in [F5] now give I2(U;(V,E))=I2((E,V);U)=I2(E;U)+I2(V;U∣E)=0+I2(U;V∣E). Expanding instead in the order (V,E) gives I2(U;(V,E))=I2(U;V)+I2(U;E∣V)≥I2(U;V). Thus I2(X0n−1;X^0n−1)≤I2(X0n−1;X^0n−1∣E), using only nonnegative extended sums and the explicitly zero independent term. Conditional on E, outputs from distinct test-channel blocks are sampled independently according to Wk, and leftover outputs are deterministic. Enlarge the source window to include every source coordinate in a full length-k block intersecting [0,n−1], and enlarge the output to include each such full test-channel block output plus the leftover reconstructions inside the window. The original source and output windows are coordinate projections of these enlarged finite vectors, so [F6], applied conditionally on each marker realization, bounds the original information by the enlarged information. Conditional output entropy is subadditive across block outputs and leftover symbols. Given the enlarged source and E, the block outputs are independent and the leftover symbols are deterministic, so conditional output entropy is the sum of the block conditional entropies. Each length-k block has the stationary source law followed by Wk, and hence contributes Ik bits; each leftover symbol contributes at most log⁡2∣X^∣ bits. There are at most n/k+2 intersecting channel blocks, and stationarity makes the expected number of leftover sites in the window nα. Therefore 1nI2(X0n−1;X^0n−1)≤(1k+2n)Ik+αlog⁡2∣X^∣.

5.1F1step 1.1step 3.1step 3.2step 4.1step 4.2givenalgebra∎

Since rk<r, choose p>0 small enough that (k−1)plog⁡2∣X^∣<r−rk (if the logarithm is zero, any p∈(0,1) works). Taking n→∞ in step 4.2 and using step 3.2 yields a limiting upper information rate at most rk+(k−1)plog⁡2∣X^∣<r. step 3.1 and step 4.1 give the required stationary ergodic pair and distortion bound.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

137 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources