How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Finite Hayashi–Nagaoka operator inequality
Statement
Let be nonnegative endomorphisms of a finite-dimensional complex inner-product space , with . Define spectrally on and set it to zero on . Then
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Nonnegative on finite-dimensional with .
Non-negative and positive operators: means is nonnegative.
Complex spectral theorem: a normal endomorphism of a finite-dimensional complex inner product space has an orthonormal eigenbasis, and conversely and A non-negative operator has a unique non-negative square root: nonnegative endomorphisms have finite orthonormal eigenbases and their square roots are defined by taking nonnegative square roots of eigenvalues.
Proof
If , every endomorphism, including , is zero, so the asserted inequality is . Henceforth assume , as required by [F2]. Set , , and . For and endomorphisms , expanding and dividing by gives . Apply this with and . Since , expansion of and the preceding inequality give Now , so congruence by gives ; the last equality follows because commutes with . Since , substitution and collection of the two terms yield By [F2], ; [F3] and give by diagonalizing . Therefore . Taking in the last display proves
Let be the orthogonal projection onto . If , then ; both terms are nonnegative, so each is zero. By [F3], these terms are and , hence . Since are self-adjoint, they preserve the orthogonal complement of as well. Thus both sides of the desired inequality are block diagonal for . On , congruence of step 1.1 by the inverse of the restriction of gives . On this block, , so its left side is . On , the desired inequality is , since there. Combining these two block inequalities proves the Statement, including when either block is zero-dimensional.
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
21 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Mark M. Wilde, From Classical to Quantum Shannon Theory, second-edition prepublication v8, Lemma 16.4.1 (standard reference, not scraped)
- John Watrous, The Theory of Quantum Information, §8.1.2 (standard reference, not scraped)