Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Finite square-root measurement packing bound for cq states

Statement

Let X be a finite nonempty set, let p be a probability vector, and let σx be density operators on a finite-dimensional H. Let σˉ=∑xpxσx. Suppose that for every x in the support of p, projections Π,Πx satisfy tr⁡(Πσx)≥1−u,tr⁡(Πxσx)≥1−u,rank⁡Πx≤d, and ΠσˉΠ⪯D−1Π, where u∈[0,1] and d,D>0. For M≥1, draw X1,…,XM independently with law p. Then the square-root POVM built from Γm=ΠΠXmΠ has expected average error at most 2(u+2u)+4(M−1)dD.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A finite ensemble of states, projectors obeying the displayed bounds, and independent random codewords.

[F1]

Density operator: each σx is nonnegative with trace one.

[F2]

Gentle measurement bound in finite dimensions: acceptance at least 1−u implies trace-norm disturbance at most 2u.

[F3]

Finite Hayashi–Nagaoka operator inequality: if 0⪯S⪯I and T⪰0, then I−(S+T)−1/2S(S+T)−1/2⪯2(I−S)+4T, with the inverse on support.

[F5]

Trace Norm Duality And Norm Properties: for an effect E, ∣tr⁡(EX)∣≤∥X∥1 when X is Hermitian.

[F6]

Trace of a product of positive semidefinite matrices is nonnegative: the trace of a product of two nonnegative operators is nonnegative.

[F8]

Trace is a linear functional on Mn(F): trace is linear over finite sums and scalar multiples.

Proof

1.1F4givenconstructalgebra

For a realized codebook, set Γm=ΠΠXmΠ and S=∑mΓm. Since each factor is a projection, 0⪯Γm⪯I. Define Λm=S−1/2ΓmS−1/2 on supp⁡S and zero on its kernel; add Λ0=I−∑mΛm. By [F4], all Λm are nonnegative and ∑mΛm is the support projection of S, so (Λ0,Λ1,…,ΛM) is a POVM.

1.2F1F6F7F8givenalgebra

For j≠m, independence of Xj and Xm gives E tr⁡(ΓjσXm)=tr⁡(Π E[ΠXj] Π σˉ)=tr⁡((Π E[ΠXj] Π)(ΠσˉΠ))≤D−1tr⁡(Π E[ΠXj] Π)≤d/D. The first equality factors the finite independent expectation into the product of its two means and distributes the finite trace sum using [F8]; the second uses [F7] and the support of the first factor. For the first inequality, D−1Π−ΠσˉΠ is nonnegative, so [F6] applied to its product with the nonnegative first factor gives the trace bound. For the last inequality, I−Π is nonnegative and [F6]–[F7] give tr⁡(ΠΠxΠ)=tr⁡(ΠxΠ)≤tr⁡(Πx)≤d.

2.1F1F2F3F5F6F7F8step 1.1algebra

For the transmitted codeword Xm, [F3] applied with S0=Γm and T0=∑j≠mΓj gives the operator inequality I−Λm⪯2(I−Γm)+4∑j≠mΓj. Since σXm is nonnegative by [F1], [F6] applied to its product with the nonnegative difference of the right and left sides preserves the order after taking trace, and trace linearity [F8] expands the resulting right side to tr⁡((I−Λm)σXm)≤2tr⁡((I−Γm)σXm)+4∑j≠mtr⁡(ΓjσXm). The gentle bound [F2] for the global projection gives ∥ΠσXmΠ−σXm∥1≤2u. Since ∥ΠXm∥≤1, trace-norm duality [F5], cyclicity [F7], and Γm=ΠΠXmΠ then give tr⁡(ΓmσXm)=tr⁡(ΠXmΠσXmΠ)≥tr⁡(ΠXmσXm)−2u≥1−u−2u.

3.1step 2.1step 1.2algebrachoose∎

Average step 2.1 over all messages and codebooks. Its first term is at most 2(u+2u) by the acceptance estimate there, and each of the M−1 competing terms is at most 4d/D by step 1.2. Thus the expected average error has the claimed bound. Because the codebook sample space is finite, at least one realization has error no greater than its expectation.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

44 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources