Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passverified 2026-08-04 (gpt-5.6-sol-codex-subscription)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

At most k cyclic intervals of length k in a cyclic order are pairwise intersecting when the ground-set size is at least 2k

Statement

Let 1≤k and n≥2k, and place an n-element set in a cyclic order. Among its n cyclic intervals of length k, every pairwise intersecting family has at most k members.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Natural numbers 1≤k and n≥2k, a cyclic order (a0,…,an−1), and a pairwise intersecting family I of its length-k cyclic intervals, with indices read modulo n.

[F1]

A family is intersecting when every two of its members have nonempty intersection (Intersecting uniform families of finite sets).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

If I is empty there is nothing to prove. Otherwise rotate the notation so that I0:={a0,…,ak−1} belongs to I.

given
1.2

For each j∈{1,…,k−1}, the interval starting at aj and the interval starting at aj−k are disjoint: the latter ends at aj−1 and the former begins at aj, and together they use two adjacent blocks of k positions without wrapping into each other because n≥2k.

given
2.1

Every other length-k interval in I must intersect I0. Since n≥2k, its starting position is therefore one of 1,…,k−1 or one of n−k+1,…,n−1.

step 1.1F1
3.1

Thus I contains at most one interval from each of the k−1 disjoint pairs in step 1.2, in addition to I0. Hence ∣I∣≤1+(k−1)=k.

step 2.1step 1.2F1∎

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

2 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources