Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passaudited 2026-07-31
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Erdős-Ko-Rado theorem: for 1≤k and n≥2k, an intersecting family of k-subsets of an n-set has size at most (n−1k−1), and a star attains the bound

Statement

Let A be an n-element set, where 1≤k and n≥2k. If F⊆[A]k is intersecting, then

∣F∣≤(n−1k−1).

For every fixed a∈A, the star {S∈[A]k:a∈S} is intersecting and has cardinality (n−1k−1), so the bound is attained. No uniqueness of extremal families is asserted.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: An n-element set A, natural numbers 1≤k and n≥2k, and an intersecting family F⊆[A]k.

[L1]

In any cyclic order of A, at most k length-k cyclic intervals can belong to a pairwise intersecting family (At most k cyclic intervals of length k in a cyclic order are pairwise intersecting when the ground-set size is at least 2k).

[F1]

A k-uniform family is intersecting when every two members meet, and a star consists of the k-sets through one fixed point (Intersecting uniform families of finite sets, The set [A]k of k-element subsets and the binomial coefficient (nk):=∣[n]k∣).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

A cyclic order of A is a linear ordering modulo cyclic rotation. There are (n−1)! cyclic orders: fix one element in the first position and order the remaining n−1 elements.

givenL2
1.2

Fix S∈[A]k. Exactly k!(n−k)! cyclic orders make S a cyclic interval: arrange the elements of S within one consecutive block and arrange the elements of A∖S in the complementary block.

givenL2
1.3

For a fixed a∈A, deleting a is a bijection from the star centred at a to the (k−1)-subsets of A∖{a}. The star is intersecting because all its members contain a, and its size is (n−1k−1).

F1
2.1

Count pairs (ω,S) where ω is a cyclic order and S∈F is a length-k interval in ω. By step 1.2 there are ∣F∣k!(n−k)! pairs.

step 1.2L2
3.1

By [L1], each of the (n−1)! cyclic orders occurs in at most k pairs. Hence ∣F∣k!(n−k)!≤k(n−1)!.

step 1.1step 2.1L1
4.1

Cancelling the positive factor k!(n−k)!=k(k−1)!(n−k)! in step 3.1 and using [L3] gives ∣F∣≤(n−1k−1).

step 3.1L3algebra
5.1

Step 4.1 proves the upper bound and step 1.3 exhibits an intersecting family attaining it.

step 4.1step 1.3∎

Remarks

The hypothesis n≥2k is essential. At the boundary n=2k, choosing exactly one set from each complementary pair already gives many extremal families, so the theorem deliberately does not claim that stars are the only extremizers.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

34 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources