How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced — the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted — a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated — a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Erdős-Ko-Rado theorem: for and , an intersecting family of -subsets of an -set has size at most , and a star attains the bound
Statement
Let be an -element set, where and . If is intersecting, then
For every fixed , the star is intersecting and has cardinality , so the bound is attained. No uniqueness of extremal families is asserted.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: An -element set , natural numbers and , and an intersecting family .
In any cyclic order of , at most length- cyclic intervals can belong to a pairwise intersecting family (At most cyclic intervals of length in a cyclic order are pairwise intersecting when the ground-set size is at least ).
A -uniform family is intersecting when every two members meet, and a star consists of the -sets through one fixed point (Intersecting uniform families of finite sets, The set of -element subsets and the binomial coefficient ).
An -element set has orderings, and independent finite choices multiply (A finite set with has exactly bijections onto itself, and bijections onto any set of the same cardinality, The factorial and the falling factorial , defined by recursion in , The product rule: , and ).
The binomial closed formula gives ( for ; hence , the quotient is a natural number, and ).
Proof
A cyclic order of is a linear ordering modulo cyclic rotation. There are cyclic orders: fix one element in the first position and order the remaining elements.
Fix . Exactly cyclic orders make a cyclic interval: arrange the elements of within one consecutive block and arrange the elements of in the complementary block.
For a fixed , deleting is a bijection from the star centred at to the -subsets of . The star is intersecting because all its members contain , and its size is .
Count pairs where is a cyclic order and is a length- interval in . By step 1.2 there are pairs.
By [L1], each of the cyclic orders occurs in at most pairs. Hence .
Cancelling the positive factor in step 3.1 and using [L3] gives .
Step 4.1 proves the upper bound and step 1.3 exhibits an intersecting family attaining it.
Remarks
The hypothesis is essential. At the boundary , choosing exactly one set from each complementary pair already gives many extremal families, so the theorem deliberately does not claim that stars are the only extremizers.
Depends on
- At most $k$ cyclic intervals of length $k$ in a cyclic order are pairwise intersecting when the ground-set size is at least $2k$
- Intersecting uniform families of finite sets
- The set $[A]^{k}$ of $k$-element subsets and the binomial coefficient $\binom{n}{k} := \lvert [n]^{k}\rvert$
- The factorial $n!$ and the falling factorial $n^{\underline{k}}$, defined by recursion in $\mathbb{N}$
- A finite set $A$ with $\lvert A\rvert = n$ has exactly $n!$ bijections onto itself, and $n!$ bijections onto any set of the same cardinality
- The product rule: $\lvert A \times B\rvert = \lvert A\rvert\,\lvert B\rvert$, and $\big\lvert\prod_{i<m} A_i\big\rvert = \prod_{i<m}\lvert A_i\rvert$
- $\binom{n}{k}\,k!\,(n-k)! = n!$ for $k \le n$; hence $\binom{n}{k}\,k! = n^{\underline{k}}$, the quotient $n!/(k!(n-k)!)$ is a natural number, and $\binom{n}{k} = \binom{n}{n-k}$
Used by
Dependency tree · next 3 levels
Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 66 results over 22 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- J. Matoušek and J. Vondrák, The Probabilistic Method, pp. 14-15 (standard reference, not scraped)