Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-generatedSession-authored (Fable 5 assisted)precheck passjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-08-27
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

A keyhole contour sees the two boundary values of z^(alpha-1)

Statement

Fix αC, and on the slit plane C[0,) define

zα1:=exp((α1)Logz)

with Argz(0,2π). Then for every x>0 the two boundary values on the positive axis satisfy

limy0(x+iy)α1=xα1,limy0(xiy)α1=e2πiαxα1.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A complex exponent α and the branch zα1=exp((α1)Logz) with Argz(0,2π).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

On the upper lip of the slit one has Arg(x+i0)=0, so Log(x+i0)=logx and therefore limy0(x+iy)α1=exp((α1)logx)=xα1.

givenalgebra
2.1

On the lower lip one has Arg(xi0)=2π, so Log(xi0)=logx+2πi. Hence limy0(xiy)α1=exp((α1)(logx+2πi))=e2πi(α1)xα1=e2πiαxα1.

step 1.1algebra

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

23 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources