Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedSession-authored (Fable 5 assisted)precheck passaudited 2026-08-27
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Keyhole contours evaluate Mellin-type rational integrals

Statement

Let αC, let R be a rational function with no pole on [0,), and define

f(z)=zα1R(z)

on the slit plane with Argz(0,2π). Assume that the improper integral 0xα1R(x)dx converges and that the outer and inner circles of the keyhole contour contribute 0 in the limits ρ and ε0. Then

(1e2πiα)0xα1R(x)dx=2πiRes(f,a),

where the sum runs over the poles of f away from the positive real axis.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A rational function R, a complex exponent α, and the keyhole branch of zα1 with Argz(0,2π).

[L1]

The two boundary values on the positive axis differ by the factor e2πiα (A keyhole contour sees the two boundary values of z^(alpha-1)).

[L2]

The residue theorem evaluates the full keyhole contour integral by the sum of the enclosed residues (The residue theorem for a null-homologous cycle).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

Let Γε,ρ be the keyhole contour of inner radius ε and outer radius ρ. Applying [L2] to f(z)=zα1R(z) on the slit annulus gives Γε,ρf(z)dz=2πiRes(f,a), where the sum is over the enclosed poles away from the positive axis.

L2
1.2

The contour integral splits into outer circle, upper lip, inner circle, and lower lip. By hypothesis the two circular contributions vanish. The assumed convergence of the improper integral and the upper boundary value in [L1] make the upper lip tend to 0xα1R(x)dx. The lower lip has the reverse orientation and boundary value e2πiαxα1R(x), so it tends to e2πiα0xα1R(x)dx.

L1given
2.1

Taking ε0 and ρ in step 1.1 and substituting the boundary terms from step 1.2 yields (1e2πiα)0xα1R(x)dx=2πiRes(f,a). The finite set of poles of the rational factor is eventually enclosed, so this is the sum over all poles of f away from the positive axis and hence the claimed keyhole identity.

step 1.1step 1.2

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

21 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources