How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Koszul Resolution Minimality Maximal Ideal Sequence
Statement
Let be a local ring and let be a finite free -module. If and resolves , then it is a minimal free resolution because every differential matrix has entries among the .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The rings, finite sequences, modules, and local hypotheses stated in the claim. The declared prerequisites used here are Koszul Complex Resolves A Regular Quotient, Minimal Free Resolution Over A Local Ring, Koszul Differential Coordinate Formula.
Proof
In the exterior bases, every matrix coefficient of is or , hence belongs to .
Since is finite free, every term is finite free. The assumed acyclicity and degree-zero quotient therefore make the Koszul complex a finite free resolution, and the containment from step 1.1 is precisely the local minimality criterion.
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
12 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- The Stacks Project, Koszul complexes and regular sequences (standard reference, not scraped)